5 Ways to Avoid a Ponzi Scheme: Madoff Edition

How not to get caught up in investment fraud

December 16, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

Imagine trusting your hard-earned money—such as your retirement savings—to a financial adviser only to lose it all in a fraudulent scheme. Obsessing about whether your money manager could be the next Bernard Madoff, the alleged mastermind of a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, isn't going to do much good, but some healthy skepticism won't hurt. Here are five tips for investors so they can avoid getting taken to the cleaners:

Make sure your adviser is legit. If you're looking for an adviser, ask friends and relatives for recommendations—but don't stop there. A scary truth is that anyone can call himself or herself a financial planner or adviser, so it pays to check with national organizations that issue credentials. They include the National Association of Personal Financial Advisers, the Financial Planning Association, and the Certified Financial Board of Standards. Each offers a searchable database with contact information for planners in each state. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants has a list of CPAs who've earned the personal financial specialist designation.

Dig deep. Put on your gumshoes and find out how long the adviser has been in the business. Ask to see his or her ADV Form, Part II, which a planner files with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It contains information about the adviser's background, services, and fees. Check for complaints filed though your state's securities regulator (contact information is available here). A site visit might also be helpful, says Tim Kochis, chief executive of Aspiriant, a wealth management firm with offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles that caters to high-net-worth clients. "Reputation and apparent track record are not enough," he says. "You have to go way beyond that to really investigate the operations of the org and find out if what is claimed is real."

Understand the difference between a manager and a custodian. A custodian, which would include the Fidelitys and Charles Schwabs of the world, is in possession of your investment account and issues periodic statements of transactions. The manager of assets executes those transactions. "A lot of people fail to understand why it's important to separate these functions," says Kochis. "Frauds almost always occur when those two things are put together." In other words, look out for an investment manager who wants complete control of your money and asks that checks be made out to him or her. You can sleep tight if your funds are in the custody of a broker-dealer firm regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and backed by the Securities Investor Protection Corp. But make sure you receive at least quarterly statements, says Mickey Cargile, founder and managing partner WNB Private Client Services, which is based in Midland, Texas. "The key is that you get it directly from the custodian and not from the adviser."

Be skeptical of pitches for exotic or obscure products. Banks, brokerages, and planners offer a wide range of financial products, including exotic investments that incorporate leverage and complex derivatives. If you get a pitch for an asset class you're not familiar with, make sure you understand the process by which it achieves returns. Jim Wiandt, editor and publisher of the Journal of Indexes and publisher of IndexUniverse.com, puts it like this: "If you don't understand it, you shouldn't be in it." Cargile takes it a step further: "Only invest in transparent assets. We don't invest in anything we can't turn to cash in three days or less, which limits us to stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds." A hedge fund, which isn't required to disclose its holdings, is an example of a nontransparent investment. Also, be especially wary if your adviser downplays or denies risk.

Be especially vigilant if you're nearing or in retirement. According to a recent study by the North American Securities Administrators Association, nearly half of all investor complaints submitted to state securities agencies came from the senior set. According to the association, bogus operators sometimes con older investors through free-lunch seminars that are followed by calls from salespeople a few days later (a common recommendation is to liquidate securities and use the proceeds to buy indexed or variable annuities).

Oh, and one bonus tip: If someone promises an investment return that is unnaturally high or steady, the warning alarm should start sounding.

Tags:
Bernard Madoff,
investing,
fraud

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

How about remembering not to invest everything in one place ?!? How many of those stories did we hear about that people "lost everything with Madoff".

Everything should not be with one person or company. Were those people awake? Sounds like their brains went to sleep when they met Madoff.

http://seekinglemonade.blogspot.com/ of CA 4:06PM March 06, 2009

Here are the top of my list, where new monies are used to pay off accounts until a run on the money shows nothing but blue sky - your basic Ponzi Scheme:

1. Large banks like CitiGroup, WAMU, BofA, and WellFargo who have received hundreds of billions of dollars from government (taxpayer) bailouts and still have nothing to show as the blue sky has fallen and there are few tangible assets.

2. Large insurance companies like AIG who have also received over $100 billion in federal bailout money to prop it up while it sells off any tangible assets that remain - not much compared to all the blue sky that has fallen.

3. WallStreet bankers, stock brokers and securities peddlers who kept pushing the value of stock beyond what was rational - some upwards to 50 times earnings... bamm... the bubble bursted and investors, retirees, and pension funds got burned big time.

Tony Lee of CA 11:19AM March 06, 2009

Most of your advice would not have avoided an investment in Madoff Securities except being suspicious about too good to be true returns and using a custodian. However, not following those two points of advice could easily be rationalized. While a careful look at many years of his published returns might raise suspicion that information may not have been readily available and certainly the returns would have tracked some other investments with similar returns for periods of time. Didn't he have a 40 year track record and a stellar reputation? The most important advice is to diversify your investments and you missed that entirely. The people who put everything or a substantial portion of their assets in that one investment account violated that rule. They left themselves open to that loss. Don't get me wrong, I do sympathize with the victims.

CO of Queens of NY 11:51AM January 03, 2009

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

advertisement