Obama Courts Small-Business Owners

January 28, 2010 RSS Feed Print

President Barack Obama assumed a decidedly populist tone last night as he called for a multilayered safety net for the country's ailing small businesses. In a speech peppered with references to individual letters from Americans and examples from various cities across the country, Obama promised infusions of cash and tax credits for small-business owners. And as he bashed Wall Street for its role in the recession, he looked to frame the remaining stages of the government's recovery plan as an attempt to salvage average companies rather than large banks.

[See Why Wall Street Won't Buy Candidates.]

"Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and are ready to grow," Obama said in his State of the Union address. "But when you talk to small-business owners in places like Allentown, Pa., or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they are mostly lending to bigger companies."

To that end, Obama proposed spending $30 billion to increase small businesses' access to credit. The money would come from the funds that Wall Street firms have paid back to the government in the aftermath of the $700 billion bank bailout.

[See Obama Tells Banks: "We Want Our Money Back".]

"It's certainly a good start, and it's something that we're very supportive of," Molly Brogan, a spokesperson for the National Small Business Association, says of Obama's proposal. "Small businesses are struggling. They're not getting any kind of capital; they can't get financed. So moving these kinds of funds through community banks, which are some of the few banks that are still making character-based loans and are still lending to small businesses, just makes sense, in our opinion."

In the NSBA's year-end study for 2009, 78 percent of the small-business owners who responded said that they had been hurt by the credit crisis. More than one third of respondents said that they couldn't get adequate financing.

Overall, though, the response to the lending proposal was lukewarm. "Community banks don't need any money to loan to small businesses. They've got plenty of money; they're flush with cash," says Jim Blasingame, a small-business expert and the host of The Small Business Advocate Show, a nationally syndicated radio show. The real problem, Blasingame says, is that not enough businesses are in a position to take out loans. "Small businesses aren't borrowing money," he says. "Small businesses aren't coming to the banks to ask for loans."

According to Blasingame, what small businesses need is job creation in the broader economy so that consumers will have more money to spend on the products the businesses produce.

Another potential issue is that it remains unclear what types of strings the Obama administration will attach to the $30 billion. Brogan acknowledged that if the terms are too restrictive, businesses could be skeptical. "They've got to do something to … make it appealing to community banks," she says.

Raymond Keating, the chief economist for the Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council, is also hesitant. "Do you want to go down the path of having the government come in and give you money with all the strings?" he asks. "Frankly, I'm not quite sure a lot of banks want to go down that path."

Obama got broader support from small-business advocates for his plans to encourage exports and to take part in free-trade agreements. "[The] more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America," the president said. "So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support 2 million jobs in America."

Elsewhere in his speech, he said, "If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores."

While many of Obama's remarks were expected, his enthusiasm for trade proposals caught a number of experts off guard—and left them pleasantly surprised. Keating says that he didn't expect the president to delve into the debate. "It would be a good thing [if we can get] off the sidelines," he says. "The fact that he indicated that is probably the biggest positive out of the speech."

Tags:
small business,
Obama administration

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

No businessman in his right mind will allow their decision to hire someone to be affected by the presence or absence of a tax credit. No businessman in his right mind would consider the SBA a viable source for financing.

No businessman in his right mind would consider the government, whose only available move is to ADD MORE BUREACRACY a source of recovery. All the government can do is burn wealth. It does not create wealth. "The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples money".

In 1940 we had 3 intelligence agencies, FBI, Navel Intelligence and Army Intelligence. Now how many do we have? 12? and how’s that working out for you?

The problem is not Obama, or the Dems or Republicans. It is, as the crafters of the Constitution warned against, that we have a Ruling Elite, who consider themselves uniquely qualified to lead the “middle class minds”.

Term Limits, Line Item Veto, Limit campaign contributions to $50 from any one source.

Lew of VA 10:05AM February 03, 2010

Self-employed here with 4 kids-guess you'll have to be in a "union" to get the jobs he's talking about ( do not forget his closed door meetings with the union reps )-What about all our veterans-past & present-His talk is just that-TALK- now that the health care got swept away because of 1 Repulbican winning an election- Look like "his majesty" got what he deserves-We are an educated county & can read through the lines-Oh yea, that's right - the normal American would not understand the bills his cronies put out !!! Boy, many Americans fell for his "speech". What a joke!

Sean F. Roberts, Sr. of PA 9:44PM February 02, 2010

Jon Ponder | January 8, 2008

The Republican Party has been in control of the government since 1994, and now our standard of living has fallen below that of the United Kingdom, where the liberals have been in charge for 11 years:

For the first time in more than 100 years, British living standards have risen above those of Americans, a report has declared.

Increasing incomes, longer holidays and “free” healthcare have all contributed to making Britons better off than our friends across the Atlantic, according to the respected Oxford Economics consultancy.

The feel-rich factor is calculated using the gross domestic product (GDP) per citizen – an indicator of average incomes – which in Britain will be £23,500 this year, compared with £23,250 in America, it predicts.

Even today, the Democrats took nominal control of Congress in 2006 but Republican have used their veto-proof majorities to remain in control.

Bottom line: the conservative movement is a sham and has been a disaster for America.

Jame of CO 9:12PM February 02, 2010

U.S. News Rankings & Research

U.S. News delivers quality analysis and clear objective rankings to help you make informed financial decisions.

advertisement

advertisement