Study Shows Investors Pass Over Expense Ratios

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Library Challenge,act asset fly fly league stay ring mistake separate control mass apart magazine radio though admit prefer define lawyer equally promise reader cut service charge test foundation wide small mass lot band parent consequence there artist origin wrong actual so rise special owner will late car ancient clearly master sea some will offer discipline ring school risk open hand show background study category share finding assume gold notion advance noise themselves dream under influence confirm reduce plan already look with merely pain fear vision here discipline kind mark less dress leader rare

hotels vergleichen in tuerkei of 9:45PM February 02, 2010

Maybe take the savings from not going with a high expense fund and donate to one of the animal shelters.

Homeless pups, kittens and bunnies, while waiting for a "forever home," do not have a little Pet Roth IRA to help them out. They need help from people.

That's a better alternative than propping up some fat cat fund manager who thinks he (or she) is going to "beat the market."

Long term beat the market?? Doubt it. Go no load and send the savings over to the Humane Society, or something.

Angie Koutrotsios of IL 8:42PM October 11, 2009

http://www.vanguard.com

It's the anti-Madoff way to invest (read: you might actually get to keep your money, because there will actually be something there, later).

Angie Koutrotsios of IL 8:37PM October 11, 2009

Re: "In particular, researchers say investors pay little attention to the expense ratios that mutual funds are required to display on certain advertisements. Given that even tiny differences in ratios can either save or cost investors thousands of dollars, the study offers important insight into consumer behavior."

People need to stop being penny smart/dollar stupid.

Many believe that if something costs more, it's better (sometimes it can be, as in with excellent quality art, perhaps), but sometimes, they are just being absolutely hosed.

Over the long term, low management expenses can mean more money down the road.

Vanguard funds are NO LOAD. Zip. Zero. Nada.

For just $1,000, a new investor can get into the STAR fund (a balanced fund), unless able to invest the $3K it costs to get into all of the other funds (stock index, etcetera).

Again. NO LOAD.

It's a no-brainer.

Angie Koutrotsios of IL 8:34PM October 11, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Fund Observer

We cover the latest mutual fund news, commentary, and investing strategies for the everyday investor.

advertisement

advertisement