-
For Money Market Funds, Changes Are Mostly Cosmetic
Tweet Share on Facebook January 28, 2010 CommentThe Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday approved a series of proposals that will further regulate money market funds. As a result of the SEC's vote, money market funds will have to report their net asset values more frequently and meet new liquidity minimums. Regulators hope that the changes, which are mostly cosmetic, will soften the funds' image in the aftermath of a rough year.
[See Money Market Insurance Program Set to Expire.]
One of the bigger changes that the SEC approved is a new liquidity threshold for money market funds. Under the guidelines, they will be required to be able to sell at least 10 percent of their assets within one day and 30 percent within one week to meet potential redemption requests.
-
The Forecast for Financials
Tweet Share on Facebook January 28, 2010 CommentIn Wednesday's State of the Union address, President Obama reiterated his plans to propose a tax on some of the country's largest banks and legislation that could limit their size and restrict certain types of trading. A wave of populism has swept through the country, and big banks seem to be bearing the brunt of citizens' frustration. Questions about what the final proposals will seek to accomplish has rattled the stock market. What does this antibanker sentiment in Washington mean for investors? Jeff Arricale, manager of the T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (symbol PRISX), says that uncertainty about potential regulation hasn't stopped him from investing in some of the biggest names in the banking industry. He runs a sector fund, meaning it primarily focuses on one slice of the market. The fund returned 28 percent in 2009 and an annualized 5 percent over the past decade. U.S. News spoke with Arricale to get a better understanding of the situation and who's most likely to be affected by further regulation of Wall Street. Excerpts:
[See 4 Funds For the Record Books.]
-
Socially Responsible Funds Drawing Lines in the Sand
Tweet Share on Facebook January 26, 2010 Comment (1)How socially responsible is socially responsible enough? That's the awkward question that managers across the country are grappling with as they balance the need to be profitable against their investors' demands for funds that follow strict guidelines. Think of it in terms of vegetarianism versus veganism.
In the investing world, the debate plays out like this: Do fund providers merely need to employ rudimentary screens? If that's not enough, how thorough do the screens need to be before they are sufficient? These questions are important for two reasons. First, they are impossible to resolve. And second, they are being asked more and more as social, environmental, and religious funds proliferate. Last month, FaithShares Trust introduced the world's first Christian exchange-traded funds. Four of its ETFs represent specific denominations—Lutheran, Methodist, Baptist, and Roman Catholic—and one is a catch-all Christian fund. Each of the first four tracks a different proprietary large-cap index that is molded around the given denomination's guidelines as to what constitutes an acceptable investment. The Christian fund's index is a hybrid of the other four.
-
The Skinny on Utilities Funds
Tweet Share on Facebook January 26, 2010 CommentUtilities mutual funds and ETFs have historically been defensive investments because they can offer yields that provide some cushion in bear markets. These funds may be an appropriate investment for those who are looking for noncyclical or defensive investments, as the demand for gas, electricity, and water utilities is constant throughout market cycles and therefore leads to consistent dividend yields. Over the past decade, many of the funds have added unregulated utilities companies and emerging-market investments to their core regulated utility holdings, increasing their volatility. Currently, there are 23 utilities mutual funds and 19 utilities ETFs, according to Morningstar. U.S. News spoke with mutual fund analysts about how investors can use these funds, how they perform in bull and bear markets, and how they respond to interest rate changes.
[See the 10 Strangest Mutual Funds.]
-
Why Directors Should Have ‘Skin in the Game’
Tweet Share on Facebook January 25, 2010 CommentMutual funds whose directors have "skin in the game" significantly outperform their competitors, according to a study by Syracuse University Prof. David Weinbaum. His results confirm the commonly held belief that directors who are invested in the funds that they oversee act as better stewards than directors who don't have any money on the line.
[See Study Shows Increases in Mutual Fund Fees.]
In the study, which was published last month in the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Weinbaum and his colleagues examine roughly 1,000 actively managed stock funds from the 25 largest fund providers. They break the funds into four groups based on the amount of ownership interest that their directors have. The funds in the bottom quartile don't have any directors with money in them, while those in the top group are marked by significant director investment. All told, the funds in the top quartile have outperformed those in the bottom one by upwards of 2 percent per year.
-
How to Invest in Commodities
Tweet Share on Facebook January 22, 2010 Comment (2)Commodities remain an extremely volatile investment, but many advisers recommend that investors consider using commodities in a small part of their portfolio for purposes of diversification. The term is used for products that range from natural gas to pork bellies. "Five years ago, they were more of a novelty," says Tom Lydon, editor of ETFTrends.com. "Now, with the potential of inflation and the greater demand for commodities around the world, there's definitely a reason to have between 5 and 10 percent of your overall allocation in commodities." Here's a few things to consider before investing:
Understand the risks. For some investors who are willing to think outside the box, investing in commodities can actually bring down the overall volatility of their portfolio. Investing in commodities alone is an extremely volatile endeavour, and investors should be aware of this before they consider investing. "There's of course going to be times when commodities don't do well," says Tom Idzorek, chief investment officer at Ibbotson Associates, a Morningstar company. "If people are scared off by that, then chances are commodities aren't for them."
-
ETFs to Get Their Own Trade Group
Tweet Share on Facebook January 20, 2010 CommentPublic relations specialist Irving Straus says that by the middle of next month, he will unveil the ETF Council, a trade group for exchange-traded funds. The council will be charged with making ETFs more visible and lobbying for them in the federal government.
[See ETFs Cross $1 Trillion Mark.]
For years, Straus has represented financial services companies through his public relations firm, Straus Corporate Communications. He is also the founder of the Mutual Fund Education Alliance, a group that works to promote mutual funds. With his new venture, Straus hopes to give the budding ETF industry its first unified and exclusive front. "The idea here is to have a voice of the ETF industry," he says.
-
What Would It Take to Slow Bond Flows?
Tweet Share on Facebook January 19, 2010 CommentFor the past 43 weeks, mutual funds have experienced net inflows (i.e., shareholders have invested more money than they have pulled out). The key component of this streak is abundantly clear: Bond funds have been on a tear. According to Morningstar, mutual funds took in $377 billion in 2009. Of that, $357 billion came from bond funds. U.S. stock funds, meanwhile, experienced net outflows to the tune of $25.7 billion. An interesting question, then, is: What would it take to unhinge the powerful momentum that bond funds have picked up? U.S. News asked Avi Nachmany, a cofounder of the mutual fund research and intelligence company Strategic Insight. His response:
-
Where the Dividends Are
Tweet Share on Facebook January 15, 2010 CommentThe numbers are in, and it turns out that 2009 was a record-breaking year for dividend investors. But some records don't warrant celebration. According to an analysis by Standard & Poor's of about 7,000 domestic companies, dividend cuts cost investors in U.S. stocks somewhere in the neighborhood of $58 billion in 2009. S&P says that 804 U.S. companies decreased their dividends last year, up from just 110 in 2007. Meanwhile, 1,191 domestic companies increased their payouts, compared with 1,874 in 2008 and 2,513 in 2007. All told, according to Standard and Poor's, 2009 was the worst year for U.S. dividends since the company began tracking them in 1955.
[See How to Add Yield to Your Portfolio.]
In this climate, if you're wondering where the dividends are, you're hardly alone. But if you're willing to hunt for them, there are plenty of pockets internationally where dividend payouts remain relatively strong. U.S. News spoke with David Ruff, a comanager of Forward International Equity Fund, about dividend opportunities abroad. In 2009, Ruff's fund gained 36 percent. Excerpts of our discussion:
-
ETFs Cross $1 Trillion Mark
Tweet Share on Facebook January 14, 2010 CommentExchange-traded funds now have more than $1 trillion invested in them, according to a report released by BlackRock. The report indicates that globally, ETFs' assets under management shot up by 45.2 percent in 2009, leaving the funds with $1.032 trillion in them at the end of the year.
[See Mutual Funds: Why the Cup is Flowing Over.]
In the United States, assets under management in ETFs soared from $497.1 billion at the end of 2008 to $705.5 billion by the time 2009 wrapped up. During that period, the number of U.S. ETFs went from 698 to 772. In Europe, meanwhile, ETF assets grew from $142.6 billion to $223.5 billion. "ETFs are growing in importance to investors globally, mainly in the U.S. and Europe, and I think that momentum is going to continue," says Paul Justice, an ETF strategist for Morningstar.













