House Passes Much Needed Credit Reform

May 1, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Today's guest post comes from Odysseas Papadimitriou, founder of Evolution Finance, which publishes the Wallet Blog:

This week, the House passed a bill that would affect the credit card industry by, among other things, getting rid of retroactive rate hikes and double-cycle billing. Double-cycle billing eliminates the interest-free period for consumers who move from paying their credit card balance in full to carrying a balance. (The Senate could pass a similar version of the bill next week.)

We support this bill because it promotes transparency in credit card terms. Double-cycle billing and retroactive rate hikes are ways in which credit card companies confuse the issue of how much the card will actually end up costing a consumer. They make it exceedingly difficult for consumers to look at the various plans being offered to them and to choose between them, because it becomes difficult to determine on what grounds someone should make that choice. Any laws that take away counter-intuitive fee determinations are good because they make fee plans easier to understand.

Opponents of the bill seem to understand the need for consumers to have multiple credit options. They do not seem, however, to understand that such practices hide the true cost of a credit card and therefore they do not allow the free market principles to get applied. The goal should be to make consumer comparison between the options an easier task instead of multiplying the variety of terms and conditions. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, betrays this kind of reasoning when he states, “We shouldn't take credit opportunities away. I just want consumers to have choices. I want there to be a competitive marketplace.”

While we appreciate Representative Hensarling’s sentiment, it has to be understood that credit card companies are not going to lose any revenue because they cannot charge their customers money through a rate plan which is, to put it plainly, sneaky. The kind of competition that we are supporting by letting companies do business in this way is one in which trickery and deception are rewarded. Ultimately, the market place would be much more competitive if consumers understood the fees associated with each credit card and could use a credit card comparison engine, like Card Hub (owned by the same company as the Wallet Blog), to decide which credit card is best for them.

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Really enjoyed reading this post -- great summary of the new bill and issues impacting credit card consumers. It's about time that we see some increased transparency in the credit card industry. I want to finally understand the true costs associated with these credit cards, and what's involved in my current credit card plans. Anyways, great post again!

Anna of VA 3:48PM May 20, 2009

I pretty much have given up on trying to figure out any of this stuff. I think they should make a law that you must get notified when whatever deal they've offered you is about to expire. That way I could stay on top of which credit card I need to immediatly pay off. As far as the cards now changing terms just because they can, it seems ridiculous that anyone allowed for this loophole in the first place.

monstro of MA 10:39AM May 06, 2009

This is a great post because it nails the issue. No one is against credit card companies making money. Just do not make money by trying to hide the true cost of your product!

Heather of DC 2:08AM May 03, 2009

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about making smarter financial decisions. She’s the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement

rounded corners

Slideshows »
10 ‘Digital Utilities’ You Need Every Day