Obama to Banks: Give the People Calculators

June 18, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Buried towards the end of President Obama's 85-page financial reform plan lies a relatively simple solution to banking complexities: He proposes that banks should provide online calculators that would make it easy for people to figure out how much money they owe and how long it will take them to pay back debts.

These online calculators would let people enter different time periods or payment amounts above the minimum. "The [Consumer Financial Protection Agency] should mandate a calculator disclosure in circumstances where the CFPA determines the benefits to consumers outweigh the costs. It should also mandate or encourage calculator disclosures for mortgages to assist with comparison shopping. For example, a calculator that shows the cost of a mortgage based on the consumer's expectations for how long she will stay in the home may reveal a more significant difference between two products that appears on standard paper disclosures," the report says.

The report acknowledges that online calculators are already readily available on the Internet. But it's not always easy for consumers to find the calculator that best suits their needs, and that's where the banks' calculators could come in. For example, for a consumer looking to make a mortgage calculation, one-size-fits all calculators will generally ask just basic questions, from the mortgage term to the interest rate. They generally don't include the fees charged by specific institutions, state taxes, or adjustments for length of time a consumer intends to spend in a home.

Not everyone likes the calculator idea. Wayne Abernathy, executive vice president for financial institutions policy at the American Bankers Association, says it's an example of how the overall financial reform proposal is trying to apply a concept that may just work for some people to everybody. "I'm afraid this excessive reliance on technology turns people into commodities. It treats everybody like they look like one another and can spit out products that meet their needs," he says. But good banking requires individualized, person-to-person service, he says. Plus, he adds, certain demographics, such as retirees, prefer to visit bank branches as opposed to relying on their Internet connections at home.

Most large banks already dedicate portions of their websites to consumer education, and offer interactive tools and calculators for retirement savings and budgeting. Still, if the CFPA requires banks to provide specific types of calculators, it could end up costing them money.

"The big guys can take these costs and roll them into the cost of the product, but take a bank with one or two branches, and I'm guessing the cost will be higher, so it tends to further reinforce the bias in regulation that favors large banks over small ones," Abernathy says.

Do you want your bank to offer better online calculators? Share your perspective below.

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Why should the banks shoulder this cost at all? Why should this be yet another unfunded mandate? Let Yobama and Company provide standard calculators to level the playing field.

Although there are hundreds of calculators out there, most people are too stupid, ignorant, or lazy to take advantage of them, even if they can figure out how to navigate to the website. These people need to be held by the hand over and over. When it comes to thinking about finance and numbers, most people are illiterate or fatalistic. Numbers overwhelm them.

And even if these people's hands would be held, a majority will come back and complain that they were misled if things don't go right. So yet another fiduciary responsibility of the banks will be to make sure their customers understand the calculators they are being taught to use.

Jimmy of MD 11:10PM June 21, 2009

A comprehensive set of stress tests that address deteriorating credit quality and/or market value of portfolios, inability to roll short-term debt, default of a major counterparty, etc. should do the trick. The stress tests would get adjusted periodically to pick up the latest trends. The rest is implementation and oversight to make sure institutions are applying the stress tests properly.

When it comes to regulation, conceptual simplicity is key. Creating thousands of complex rules and setting up layers of bureaucracy will only allow financial institutions to find another loophole. That’s what happened with the Basle Accord.

Unfortunately simplicity doesn’t get votes, and when you have an administration that runs a permanent campaign, populism sometimes becomes the mantra.

http://www.SoberLook.com

Walter Kurtz of NY 3:59PM June 18, 2009

online this and online that is all well and good....but what if you're one of the americans who either by choice or happenstance doesn't have internet? Or you're one of those people who can barely figure out how to check your email?

The one change I would like is for Sallie Mae and Citibank to give me my amortization schedule NOW! Why do I have to wait til I'm in repayment to find out how much I need to pay them? The feds gave me theirs...why can't the private sector?

veronica of NH 1:13PM June 18, 2009

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about making smarter financial decisions. She’s the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement