Young Adults: We're Suffering, Not Thriving

July 6, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Katie Dean, press assistant for the Student Association for Voter Empowerment, didn't agree with some of Suze Orman's strong statements posted in my recent interview with her ("Suze Orman: Why the Recession Is a Good Thing"). She took particular exception to Orman's assertion that today, young people "have it so great it's not even funny." First, Orman's explanation:

If the economy kept running the way it was, you guys would have been broke for the rest of your life. Real estate was going up and up. You would never have qualified for real estate, and companies were shipping jobs offshore. So where were you going to get a job? The price of tuition was so high [that graduates] owed $150,000 in student loans. The price of milk and other prices were so off the charts. What were you people going to do? The stock market was at 14,000, so every time you put money into your 401(k), you bought less and less shares.

Dean thinks otherwise. She writes:

Although the economic overhaul may ultimately be to our advantage, Orman seems to ignore the overwhelmingly negative immediate consequences that young people are facing due to the recession.

While it is true that the few Americans fortunate enough to have a stable financial situation have been able to take advantage of the investment opportunities resulting from the recession, the vast majority of young people are suffering greatly under the economic downturn.

Orman claims that before the recession hit, the economy was growing so rapidly that consumer buying power became weak enough to preclude young people from ever affording real estate or even repaying college loans. I understand Orman's intentions in pointing out that the recession brought an upswing in buying power because, in theory, it should enable young people to afford things which were previously unavailable. However, most young people are not in a situation that allows them to take advantage of this increased buying power and thus Orman's focus on the positive elements of the recession makes her remiss in her analysis.

Dean makes a good point. It's true that young people are suffering right now. The job market is particularly tough for those under age 30, who face a higher-than-average 20 percent unemployment rate. It's hard to argue that young people are thriving right now.

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

it is an eb and flow, up and down cycle. that's how it works, it will always even itself out through supply and demand. i just hope this downturn doesn't give to much power to the liberals and tax more just to give it all away.

joe of NY 1:06PM April 30, 2010

David,

I am a baby boomer, who has saved for retirement and will be working until I am 70, due to necessity, not because it's fun. We don't have it great, our parent's generation, those now in their 70's and 80's were able to retire at 55, not so for the majority of us. Social Security was never meant to be retirement, it was meant to be a help to the very poor, unfortunately Roosevelt portrated it as 'retirement' and many people believed him to their peril. Turst me in today's climate, defense spending is worthwhile, things like 9/11 crippled our financial and insurance markets and we are still recovering from that, which most people conveniently forget in the current administration. What is very sad and what will impact your generation is that the current administration has no business sense or savvy, and do not understand how to grow the economy. You do not grow an economy through healthcare mandates and increased taxation - in a down economy - if people aren't working, how are they supposed to pay higher taxes? The government needs to act to lower federal taxes to take some of the regulatory burdens off of businesses, especially small businesses who generate 70% or more of jobs, they need to allow insurance companies to sell across state lines, enact tort reform, and get government out of the car, energy, and healthcare busiensses (they have NEVER run anything at lower cost, with better distribution or efficiency) and cease trying to achieve 'social justice' which is a fallacy and was not contemplated in the Constitution for good reason. There is no justice in taking away from people who produce and contributing and/or giving it away to those who do not. The current deficit and wreckless spending are a real worry, and the people who are paying attention are very worried for YOUR future. Pay attention to what is happening in go

of 4:40PM January 14, 2010

David,

I am a baby boomer, who has saved for retirement and will be working until I am 70, due to necessity, not because it's fun. We don't have it great, our parent's generation, those now in their 70's and 80's were able to retire at 55, not so for the majority of us. Social Security was never meant to be retirement, it was meant to be a help to the very poor, unfortunately Roosevelt portrated it as 'retirement' and many people believed him to their peril. Turst me in today's climate, defense spending is worthwhile, things like 9/11 crippled our financial and insurance markets and we are still recovering from that, which most people conveniently forget in the current administration. What is very sad and what will impact your generation is that the current administration has no business sense or savvy, and do not understand how to grow the economy. You do not grow an economy through healthcare mandates and increased taxation - in a down economy - if people aren't working, how are they supposed to pay higher taxes? The wealthy 1% of this country already pay between 40 to 60% of the federal tax burden. The government needs to act to lower federal taxes and also ensure that everyone at least pays SOME tax - if you continue to allow the majority of Americans (now close to 50%, to pay no taxes, they have no appreciation for the cost of the services and goods they receive - they need skin in the game, not merely to point at people who have more than they do and say 'you should give me some!', they also (the gov)need to take some of the regulatory burdens off of businesses, especially small businesses who generate 70% or more of jobs, they need to allow insurance companies to sell across state lines, enact tort reform, and get government out of the car, energy, and healthcare busiensses (they have NEVER run anything at lower cost, with better distributi

of 4:36PM January 14, 2010

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about making smarter financial decisions. She’s the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement

rounded corners

Slideshows »
10 ‘Digital Utilities’ You Need Every Day