Do Company Logos Matter to Consumers?

September 14, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

It might seem like an inconsequential issue, but retailers spend a lot of time (and money) designing their logos in a way that will appeal to consumers. They try to avoid fiascos like the one faced by Tropicana earlier this year when it released new images on orange juice boxes. Consumers apparently hated them; sales dropped and Tropicana reverted to the previous packaging almost immediately.

New research from Rice University's Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business suggests companies should tread more carefully before making any big design shifts, lest they turn off their loyal customers. After examining reactions to New Balance and Adidas logo changes, researchers found that "strongly committed consumers" are more likely to dislike modifications. Less committed consumers, on the other hand, are more likely to have a positive reaction.

That difference between loyal and casual customers might explain why Apple faced such an uproar over when it adopted a silver apple symbol in place of its previous red one back in 2003. Walmart, on the other hand, changed its logo without any protests last year. The researchers suggest that while Apple attracts avid fans, Walmart shoppers are more diverse, and perhaps less committed to the brand itself than the store's low prices.

Have any of your favorite brands changed their logos on you? Do you think logos influence your buying habits?

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As a logo and package designer, when I first saw Tropicana's new package, I cringed. Tropicana is market leader and the other brands have been increasingly getting too similar to their appearance. It is good marketing to map out visual differences to let consumers quickly find your product.

Unfortunately I feel their new design looked too retro (read 60s -70s dated) and frankly, not as appetizing. It was a good decision to listen and return to the previous design until their next update. Of course they must have tested the new designs in focus groups and heard positive feedback. But that is a few dozen people, not the millions who love their products. Hey, it's not easy being #1!

On the other hand, the old Walmart logo was so hideous, why would anyone "protest"? I don't love their new one as compared to more stylish Target's, but at least it doesn't hurt your eyes!

Steve of CT 9:03AM September 17, 2009

That's a good point. Easily-recognizable logos help us find what we're looking for quickly.

Kimberly Palmer of DC 9:59AM September 15, 2009

I remember being displeased with the new tropicana, if only because I didn't know it was tropicana and took me longer to find the vitamin C fortified type. That logo is the only one I remember thinking, "ugh why did they do that?."

If logos are an influence on my buying habits it is because if I can't find what I'm looking for (or think I'm looking for) then I will either buy something else or not buy anything at all

veronica of NH 1:50PM September 14, 2009

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about making smarter financial decisions. She’s the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement