Should Newborns Get $500 Each?

October 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

A proposed bill that would give each American baby a $500 savings account rubs a lot of people the wrong way: After my recent story on the legislation, dozens of readers wrote in to express their dismay. Sam from Massachusetts wrote, "Enough is enough. This would be insanity. Who gives the government the right to tax us all and pay for this." Katie of Missouri agreed: "What happened to supporting your own family? This is outrageous and I would like the names of the Republicans that support such idiocracy."

George from California dubbed it a socialist policy; Seth from South Carolina preferred the term "nanny state." Even Jay Leno got in a jab at the bill during his monologue last night. He joked that illegal immigrants would be lining up to give birth in this country if each baby received $500.

Lost amid much of this superficial debate is the research behind the proposal. As I wrote in my article, studies have found that even an amount as little as $500 can get people started on a path towards savings. People who receive such a savings account at birth are more likely to save more money and invest in their own futures, as well as feel more in control of their lives. They are more likely to participate in civic activities, earn more money, and achieve more in school. There's also evidence that holding assets, paired with financial lessons in school, leads people to have a better grasp of basic money concepts, which can serve them well for the rest of their lives.

Of course, the cost of the program—an estimated $37.5 billion for the first 10 years—is a sticking point. At a time of such concern over the federal deficit, it's hard to make the case that we should be spending even more money on an experimental program. The verdict is still out on how it would work on a large scale, but because Great Britain started a similar program in 2002, we won't have to wait too long for answers. The bill's supporters, though, are hoping that Americans will get behind it later this year, instead of waiting to see how it works out in Britain.

What do you think—should newborns receive $500? Do you think it would help set them on a path towards savings and education?

Here is a video from ABC News Now of me discussing the proposal:

For more, see: "Coming Soon: $500 for Every Newborn?"

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A woman in a Louboutin has to be special. It is these shoes that make her so special that no two can resist her two look. They are the style statement among high society women. You do not believe me; then ask some women who own them. They have a mesmerizing appeal, which is no less than a mass hypnotism, and women drive in its spell.

Christian Louboutin Sale of KS 4:54AM March 16, 2010

This is another stupid government intervention. A waste of my tax dollars that I work hard for. I work for my family and children, not to give it too some lazy people on welfare who just want a hand out!!

I am sick of the politicians just sitting around thinking of ways to give out our money! Why dont they get a real job like we all have! and let these people put their own money in a bank account for their child they earned themselves.

Denise Mills of OH 10:06PM January 11, 2010

Have a newborn on the way and I pay too much in tax for property and fed/state so I would welcome this like a rebate!

jim of NY 9:00PM January 02, 2010

Alpha Consumer

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, is the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back. Send her your personal finance questions.


advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement