Why the Customer is Often Wrong

March 17, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

I’ve recently experienced, and heard of others experiencing, some pretty terrible interactions with customer service. First, when I went to get my new Maryland driver’s license, I was initially told that I didn’t have the proper documents with me, even though I had meticulously followed the online directions. Those directions failed to warn me that I needed two forms of proof of residency, not just one. The woman at the counter abruptly turned me away and was about to move on to the next customer before I found a second form of identification that she found acceptable.

A few hours later, I ate a bagel sandwich from a nearby shop. It ended up giving me food poisoning. When I called the store to report the illness, the store manager took down all of my information without once apologizing for causing my illness. When the corporate office got in touch with me the next day to ask more detailed questions, it offered an apology – but only after insinuating that I was probably mistaken in blaming the bagel for my woes. I had half-expected at least a gift certificate.

[See Why Customer Service Has Gotten So Bad]

Lastly, over the weekend, a travel website told my friend – incorrectly – that his flight had been delayed by two hours. As a result, he missed his flight, and was stuck out of town for an extra day. He even had to pay for his unexpected hotel stay himself. When he confronted the company about it, the customer service representative essentially suggested he must have misunderstood the message. Again, no apology.

What happened to that old adage, “The customer is always right?” These days, we seem to be more frequently told that we are wrong.

One theory is that we’ve become a nation of such complainers that companies have no choice but to ignore us, because coddling us is simply too time consuming and expensive. After all, Sprint took a stand against demanding customers in 2007, when it told some of its customers that it was terminating their contracts after receiving “frequent calls” from them. Articles in the Harvard Business Review have also concluded that a small number of customers often cost companies more money than they generate, which means companies might be better off getting rid of them.

[See The Art of Complaining]

Firing customers sounds like a twisted company policy. Even if it makes sense in theory, in real life the strategy could backfire, because it makes the company look like a jerk. Other customers – good, profit-generating customers – could be turned off and take their business elsewhere, too.

That’s what Emily Yellin, Your Call Is (not that) Important to Us, told me when I interviewed her last year. She said, “I think some companies have [dropped customers] to their own detriment. … The cost to [Sprint’s] already sagging reputation was great.” She adds that customers usually aren’t being overly demanding for fun – because it’s not fun to interact with customer service and stay on hold for hours. Demanding customers usually indicate a deeper problem with the company, she says. After all, that’s why we’re complaining.

Have you had any terrible customer service experiences lately? Tell us about them.

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Thank you for the thoughts I just read. My view is that most times customers tend to approach their compliants with a bit of arrogance which culminates into the unexpected response from companies.

Customers ought to remember that company officials are as human as they are; they are not all good in public relations skills and so may respond to arrogance with contempt and "I don't care" attitude.

Vicent Olowo 9:26AM April 30, 2010

I just found this article but wanted to share what's been an interesting experience in the cable industry. Until Verizon entered the cable market in the northern NJ area, Cablevision was the only option in town.

The company had a reputation for horrible customer service. It took me about 4 months to resolve when the company claimed I missed a payment 8 months prior, despite having proof from the bank that Cablevision had retrieved payment from my account via electronic transfer. During those 4 months my cable kept getting turned off despite being told by managers and supervisors repeatedly that this would not happen while we were working on resolving the matter. Call after call at 40 minutes plus a pop, all the way up to corporate finally resolved the matter, only after which I was told that they didn't have a payment on record from even further back - they missed cashing a check I had sent in (and I hadn't noticed either).

For all of the aggravation I received nothing - not a free month of cable, nothing. (Oh, they did offer 3 free months of HBO, a service I wasn't already subscribing to. Thanks.) But many of us got our resolve when Verizon came to town with Fios. Nothing is perfect, but there was a massive shift from Cablevision to Verizon and to this day they pound the pavement trying to get their customers back - mind you without any offer to make amends for their previous behavior. (Instead they try to scare us and say that Verizon will sneakily up our bill despite the rates we locked-in.)

Nicole of NJ 3:51PM April 12, 2010

We've all heard of the Pareto principle or the 80/20 rule that you alluded to regarding Sprint and it's "firing" of customers. Because the minority spoil it for the majority, companies create rules that inconvenience everyone to fight this problem. It's possible that Sprint decided their reputation was low enough that getting rid of problems (from their point of view) could only increase their bottom line. We only have the word of these customers that they've been wronged. It seems most people have a sense of entitlement to everything and refuse to accept real mistakes.

What about the stories where people claim they found some kind of objectionable material in their food, only to be proven as con artists? Is the media reporting on these stories more or have these incidents increased? If the latter is true, I wouldn't blame companies for their more jaundiced view.

Jimmy of MD 8:41AM March 22, 2010

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about making smarter financial decisions. She’s the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement