• Comment (3)

To Avoid Poverty, Share a Home with Family

November 4, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Moving in with family members might provide fodder for Hollywood comedies, but it turns out that for many Americans, it serves a pretty serious purpose: protection against poverty. A recent report from the Pew Research Center likens the phenomenon to an “anti-poverty program” that Americans are enacting to insulate themselves from the dark side of the Great Recession.

[In Pictures: 10 Ways to Start Earning Extra Money Now]

In fact, Pew found that that there are more multigenerational households today than ever before in modern history, with a total of about 51.4 million Americans living with relatives. That’s about 16.7 percent of all Americans, the highest percentage since the 1950s. (During World War II, shared housing was more common, with about 1 in 4 Americans living in a multigenerational household.)

Not surprisingly, Pew attributes the trend to the economy, particularly the high unemployment rates among young people. About 38 percent of young adults between the ages of 18 and 29 are currently unemployed or out of the workforce, Pew reports, which is the highest percentage in almost forty years.

As anyone who has experienced multigenerational living firsthand knows, there’s a downside, too—overcrowding. Pew notes that the average multigenerational household contains 4.3 residents, compared with the more manageable 2.4 of other households. Income in those bigger households isn’t always higher, either, since economic hardship is often what brings extended families under one roof. Pew found that median household income (after adjusting for household size) was lower among multigenerational households ($57,533 versus $59,002).

[Tips for Moving Back Home with Parents]

The poverty rate, though, was lower among those multigenerational households (11.5 versus 14.6 percent), which demonstrates how helpful it can be to live with relatives. (The difference is even more striking among unemployed Americans, who face a 17.5 percent poverty rate when living in multigenerational households, compared with 30.3 percent for those in other types of households.)

The Pew report also found the following:

  • Young people between ages 25 and 34 have ramped up their multigenerational living arrangements more than any other group, with 8.7 million living in multigenerational homes in 2009, compared with 7.4 million in 2007. That translates into about 1 in 5 young adults now living with a relative.
  • Asians are most likely to live in a multigenerational home compared to other groups, with about one in four doing so. (The percentage among whites is 13.1 percent.)
  • While heads of household typically earn about 85 percent of household income, in multigenerational households, they earn just under half of household income. Meanwhile, children under age 25 living with parents contribute about 25 percent to household income.

Have you moved in with relatives to help alleviate financial stress, and if so, did it help?

Twitter: @alphaconsumer

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

yep! I am a French woman who lived and worked in the US for the past 20 years and did not find the American Dream...!!! so I moved back to my parents at the age of 44...!!!!

now what!???

knowing that everywhere you go the rent is going to kill you!!???

why bother working knowing you work to pay the rent itself anywhere on this Planet??!!!

France is a good place to go back home to as the government pays half of my rent and gives me 400 euros to live on....

not bad compared to the US!

you should all come living in my country! come on over!!:))

Namaste,

Nathalie

Nathalie the French woman of CA 4:03PM February 04, 2012

I really plan on moving back home more often than before. Frankly payinv rent ti my parents and helping them with their mortgage and saving the other part of my salaryis a smarter investment.

Efrutik of DC 9:36AM November 06, 2011

My sister now has both her young adult sons living with her AND their girlfriends. It would've been unthinkable a generation ago.

This moving in together is not necessarily a bad thing for the emotional health of everyone concerned. Whereas there is evidence that we were "Drifting Apart in the 21st Century" (book by Drs. Olds and Schwartz) with leading to a host of negative psychological effects maybe we'll see an improvement in our general emotional health.. after all we all need to be loved. It's better when that love is felt directly.

Housemates can be good for all. More at www.sharinghousing.com

Annamarie of VT 6:52AM November 06, 2011

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about making smarter financial decisions. She’s the author of Generation Earn: The Young Professional's Guide to Spending, Investing, and Giving Back.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement