-
Is a Recession Coming? Not If Consumers Can Help It
Tweet Share on Facebook March 30, 2007 CommentRemember how one of James Baker's rationales for the Persian Gulf War, beta version, back in 1991 was "jobs, jobs, jobs"? See, that's pretty much the heart of my amateur rationale for why I think the economy will avoid a recession this year despite all the fears about housing. Jobs, jobs, jobs. Well, to be exact, jobs and income. Consider the following, and see if you agree:
-
Rangel Proposal Won't Pacify the 'Seattle Democrats'
Tweet Share on Facebook March 29, 2007 Comment (1)Has Charlie Rangel, the personable chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, pulled it off? After unveiling "A New Trade Policy for America"which would attach tougher labor and environmental standards, among other provisions, to U.S. trade agreementsthe New York Democrat optimistically stated: "We are on the brink of restoring bipartisanship to American trade policy. The policies we've outlined today should send a clear message that this Congress wants trade, but we want trade that works for all Americans."
-
Will the Shrinking Budget Deficit Save Bush's Tax Cuts?
Tweet Share on Facebook March 27, 2007 CommentThe conventional wisdom in Washington, D.C., is that the Bush tax cuts, due to expire in 2010, won't be extended. The recent Democratic budget proposal, for instance, demands that the tax cuts get paid for to the tune of $200 billion a year starting in 2011. Well, maybe the child tax credit and marriage penalty stuff might get saved, but certainly not the marginal rate cuts and the reductions in dividend and capital-gains taxes.
-
No Shelter From the Housing Storm
Tweet Share on Facebook March 26, 2007 CommentAs the saying goes, never try to catch a falling knife. And what made me think of that? This: New single-family home sales declined 3.9 percent in February to an annual rate of 848,000, according to new Commerce Department data. That's the lowest level in almost seven years and much weaker than the 990,000 rate expected by the consensus. Plus, it's the absolute reverse of the 3.9 percent rise in existing home sales. Even worse, sales were revised lower for November, December, and January. Here are four Wall Street takes on the news, none of them particularly cheery:
-
America Needs More Boing Boing Economics
Tweet Share on Facebook March 23, 2007 CommentMy favorite site for all things weird, innovative, and creative is Boing Boing and not just because the site isas it correctly describes itself"a directory of wonderful things." It's also that it reminds me of how important innovation and creativity are for the future of the U.S. economy. (Yes, that's how my mind works.)
-
Bush's Nuclear Option on Taxes
Tweet Share on Facebook March 22, 2007 CommentThe Dow Jones industrial average is now back within 2.5 percent or so of its all-time high after rallying 3 percent from its 2007 nadir. (The Shanghai Sneeze and all that.) But should the Dow eclipse its old mark, there are some peopleother than massive short sellers, of coursewho won't be cheering. As they see it, stock market "records" are phony because the various averages and indexes don't take inflation into account. Here is how economist Jason Furman, in an analysis for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, dismissed the Dow when it hit a nominal high last October at 12,090:
-
Why Wall Street Loves the Fed's Subtle Shift
Tweet Share on Facebook March 21, 2007 CommentNo surprise, the Federal Reserve left short-term rates unchanged today at 5.25 percent. But in its statement after the meeting, the Fed explicitly expressed way more concern about inflation than economic growth. The Fed's Open Market Committee described price pressures as "somewhat elevated." (In its January comment, by contrast, the FOMC said inflation had "improved modestly.") What's more, the Fed said that its predominant policy concern was inflation rather than growth; the latter it expects "to continue at a moderate pace."
-
President Bush's Tax Cut Suicide
Tweet Share on Facebook March 20, 2007 Comment (3)Here are 400 billion reasons President Bush's 2001and 2003 tax cuts may not see the next decade of the 21st century. The five-year federal budget proposed by Senate Democrats last week lets the reductions stay in place after their current 2010 expiration dateif backers can come up with $400 billion to pay for them in 2011 and 2012. Extending them to 2017 would "cost" $1.8 trillion. (This sort of static analysis oddly assumes that taxeswhether higher or lowerhave no economic impact.) Now given that the current Congress is having trouble coming up with $40 billion-$50 billion for a temporary fix to the alternative minimum tax, finding a spare $200 billion a year seems like a tall order indeed. "After 2008, the default budget position is going to be higher taxes," concluded Tom Gallagher, a veteran political analyst at International Strategy & Investment Group, in a recent chat.
-
Mortgage Meltdown Not an Economy Killer
Tweet Share on Facebook March 19, 2007 Comment"What kind of dope are you smoking?" queries a faithful Capital Commerce reader, taking issue with my outlookas outlined in the recent posting "Subprime Scare Is March Madness"that problems in the subprime mortgage market will not lead to a recession. Yet I am going to stick to my guns on this one. Let me point to a new study by Christopher Cagan, director of research at First American CoreLogic, a Santa Ana, Calif.-based real-estate information firm. Cagan finds the following:
-
Greenspan's Inequality Fix: Free Trade for Lawyers and Doctors
Tweet Share on Facebook March 16, 2007 CommentTell you one thing, Alan Greenspan is way more fun now that he's no longer helming the Federal Reserve. One day he's telling rapt audiences that a recession is possiblehelping roil global financial markets in the processthe next day he's actually giving odds. (About 33 percent, if you're keeping track.)













