-
McCain's New Square Deal
Tweet Share on Facebook January 11, 2008 Comment (2)Wall Street seems to be on full-blown recession watch, while Main Street is pretty sure a downturn is on its way. Yet even with Democrats referring incessantly to a "middle-class squeeze," some GOP hopefuls have still been talking up the six-year economic expansion. Worried workers? Blame the media, not the Bush boom. As Mitt Romney—second in Iowa, second in New Hampshire—told me a few weeks back, "There's no question that the media shapes a good deal of public perception, and there is nothing that sells like fright."
Expect that sanguine attitude to change. This week's Republican primary is in Michigan, where the unemployment rate is 7.4 percent, the highest in the nation. Then, next up, on January 19 is South Carolina, which has the country's fourth-highest jobless rate. What's more, the two big Republican caucus and primary winners so far have been John McCain and Mike Huckabee, candidates who haven't been running "Morning in America" campaigns. Huckabee has blasted Wall Street greed and CEOs offshoring jobs to China. McCain continues to insist that voting against the Bush tax cuts was the right move, partly because they were too heavily weighted toward the rich—though now he's for keeping them—and has been critical of the "power of pharmaceutical companies."
-
Economy Vexes GOP at South Carolina Debate
Tweet Share on Facebook January 11, 2008 Comment (9)The Republican presidential contenders might want to watch a bit more CNBC or Fox Business Network. The first question from moderator Chris Wallace of Fox News at last night's GOP debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., was about the chances of an impending recession and what actions the candidates would take as president to prevent or minimize one. In short: Are they in favor of short-term fiscal stimulus and, if so, what kind?
But Mitt Romney, John McCain, and Rudy Giuliani all gave answers mostly about what they would do to ensure the long-run growth of the economy and appeared unaware of the fiscal stimulus debate currently happening in Washington and being closely watched by Wall Street. Only Fred Thompson seemed to have actually read the morning papers or been thoroughly briefed on the subject. And only Mike Huckabee, and Romney to a lesser extent, made a real effort to acknowledge American's widespread economic anxiety. It will be interesting to compare the GOP debate answers to the stimulus plan Hillary Clinton is supposed to unveil today. Anyway, here's a brief analysis of how the candidates responded to Wallace's critically important question:
-
Mitt Romney, Trekkie
Tweet Share on Facebook January 11, 2008 Comment (1)Last night's GOP debate also confirmed for me that Mitt Romney is a closet sci-fi geek. He answered a question about foreign policy saying that it was like "three-dimensional chess," a game that exists in the universe of Star Trek:
Today, foreign policy is no longer like it was in the last century, which was more like a game of checkers that was our side and their side. We tried to get friends and allies and go after each other. Now foreign policy is more like three-dimensional chess, where we have to understand all the players throughout the world and develop strategies to help move the world towards more stability and safety for ourselves.
Now remember, Romney has also said his favorite book is Battlefield Earth, an L. Ron Hubbard novel about an alien invasion. Moreover, he claims his favorite TV show is Lost. Indeed, when Romney gave his big religion speech a few weeks back, his words seemed to echo character Jack Shepherd, the show's heroic doctor. Here's a line from that speech: "Freedom and religion endure together or perish alone." And now a famous line from the character on the show: "Live together, die alone, man." Think about it, people.
-
Don't Fret, Sovereign Wealth Funds
Tweet Share on Facebook January 11, 2008 CommentOur guy John Tamny, editor at RealClearMarkets, has some insightful thoughts on sovereign wealth funds:
When it comes to trade, mercantilist politicians from both sides of the aisle regularly express their displeasure with our mythical trade deficit. They also consistently rail against money being sent overseas, but as the actions of certain SWFs indicate, those dollars must eventually return to the United States; in this case as investment in blue-chip investment firms. And while the aforementioned investment won't factor into governmental calculations of our trade deficit, we should consider this a "teaching moment" for those who presume trade doesn't balance. We let others make for us what's not in our economic interest to create, and the money returns in many forms, including as jobs creating investment.
Furthermore, with the dollar's weakness already well-chronicled, would we prefer that SWFs hailing from the "wrong" parts of the world simply exchange their dollars for euros, pounds and yen? If we ignore how actions such as this might weaken the dollar further, would we somehow feel better if instead of investing in American companies, the sovereign funds in question were to re-direct their capital to France, England or Japan?
-
Bernanke Gives Investors, Market a Boost
Tweet Share on Facebook January 11, 2008 CommentFrom Michael Darda, chief economist at MKM Partners:
It would appear the [Federal Open Market Committee] has decided to throw inflation caution to the wind and countenance aggressive further easing action, which may include a 50 [basis point] rate cut on or before January 30. We think this will be bullish for sectors and countries that benefit from reflation, a weak dollar, and a steepening Treasury yield curve. These would include, but are not limited to 1) emerging markets, 2) Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS), 3) junk bonds, 4) equities vs. Treasuries. Within the equity market, we favor energy, materials, industrials, technology and financials.
-
McCain Adviser: Let Fed Fix the Economy
Tweet Share on Facebook January 10, 2008 CommentJust recently I chatted with Douglas Holtz-Eakin, the former director of the Congressional Budget Office and a current economic adviser to John McCain's presidential campaign. (He's also a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.) I asked him what he thought of the idea of temporary fiscal stimulus for the economy. Both President Bush and Congress seem intent on offering up packages.
Speaking strictly for himself and not the campaign, Holtz-Eakin said he didn't think too much of the idea, noting that the economic consensus is "that for short-term fluctuations in the economy, the best course of action is to let the Fed handle it.... [It's difficult] to get the right package through Congress in a timely fashion. The notable exception was 2001 when the tax cut arrived at exactly the right moment."
Plus, stimulus can turn into an excuse for pork-barrel spending. Holtz-Eakin recalls testifying before Congress back in 1993 when the Clinton administration was considering an infrastructure spending package to stimulate the economy. Boston Mayor Ray Flynn was there, too, and told Congress he had a whole slate of projects ready to go if Uncle Sam came through with the dough. "See, you usually end up with a lot of junk," Holtz-Eakin says. A better move, he argues, would be to get rid of all the uncertainty for households through something like eliminating the alternative minimum tax.
-
Bernanke Termination Watch
Tweet Share on Facebook January 10, 2008 CommentFrom the AP:
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke pledged Thursday to slash interest rates yet again to prevent housing and credit problems from plunging the country into a recession. The Fed chief made clear the central bank was prepared to act aggressively to rescue a weakening economy. 'We stand ready to take substantive additional action as needed to support growth and to provide adequate insurance against downside risks,' he said.... Bernanke has come under criticism for not acting more aggressively to deal with the economy's problems."
My take: Interestingly, former Reagan administration economist Martin Feldstein—a longtime skeptic of fiscal stimulus—is so worried about the economy that he has advocated temporary tax cuts and rebates to boost the economy. He was on President Bush's short list to replace Alan Greenspan as Fed chairman, as was Glenn Hubbbard, formerly the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and currently dean of the business school at Columbia University. Both men might want to start donating some campaign cash to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, since the odds are growing that the next president—particularly if it's a Dem—will not renominate Helicopter Ben.
-
Giuliani's Shock-and-Awe Tax Plan
Tweet Share on Facebook January 10, 2008 Comment (6)My pal and blogger Andy Roth over at the Club for Growth just sent me this E-mail with a few more details and a sprinkling of analysis about Rudy Giuliani's $6 trillion tax plan, which would be the largest tax cut in the history of the American republic. Actually, of any republic—ours, Rome's, Greece's. Just huge:
$6.3 trillion over 10 years.
Make permanent the Bush tax cuts NOW...not in 2010
Permanently index AMT and then eliminate it when practical (no timetable).
Get rid of the Death Tax
Lower cap gains and dividend rate to 10% and index to inflation.
Lower corp rate from 35% to 25%.
Trio of tax free savings accounts—Roth style—available to ALL income classes.
- Retirement account ($5000 year/single, $10k year/couple, draw only at retirement)
- General account (same limits, available at any time for any reason)
- Lifetime skills account (only for education, job training, $1000 year/single)
Tax simplification strategy—one page tax return
Three rates—10% (40k), 15% (150k), and 30% (150k+).
It's an optional tax plan. You can pick it or the current tax code. Unlike [the Fred] Thompson plan, you can opt in and out any year. Four major deductions remain:
- Mortgage
- Charitable
- State and Local taxes
- Child tax credit
This plan would be huge. It would be 4% of GDP. By comparison, [the George W. Bush] tax cut was 1.3% of GDP. Reagan's was 1.9% of GDP.
-
Are We Talking Ourselves Into a Recession?
Tweet Share on Facebook January 10, 2008 CommentGoldman Sachs, now firmly in the recession camp as of last night, might have been a bit hasty in throwing in the towel on the economic expansion. This from the Associated Press: "The Labor Department reported that 322,000 persons filed applications for jobless benefits, down by 15,000 from the previous week when claims had declined by 20,000." A nice data point for those of us who still doubt a recession is on its way. As economist Bruce Kasman of JPMorgan notes: "It is the norm for claims to have increased by roughly 20 percent in the year before a recession begins and before the unemployment rate begins moving higher. Thus far, the rise in jobless claims is modest, more consistent with a sustained growth moderation than a recession."
Ed Yardeni of Oak Associates also makes a good point about recession fears, arguing, for instance, that analysts totally misinterpreted an AT&T earnings report:
No busy signal at AT&T? The stock market sold off...partly on news that the giant phone company said that consumers aren't paying their bills and are getting disconnected. Is the economic situation really deteriorating so rapidly? I don't think so.... I read a transcript of the company's presentation. The CEO said, "So we're really experiencing some softness on the consumer side of the house from the economy." That's all I could find.... It's OK to be pessimistic about bad stuff that is happening in the economy. It is OK to be optimistic about the good stuff. But we should be realistic, and objectively analyze the incoming data, especially during such a controversial period as now. In other words let's not exaggerate either way. The U.S. economy isn't booming. It is slowing, but it isn't in a recession yet, though it does seem to be heading in that direction. December's survey of small businesses was surprisingly mellow, with virtually no indications that small businesses are being forced to retrench as a result of a credit crunch. Most of the recent weakness in the Small Business Optimism Index is based more on anticipated rather than actual conditions: "Two-thirds of the decline in the Index since September came from two components: the outlook for real sales and expectations for business conditions six months from now. The deterioration of expectations triggered a pull-back in the labor market indicators that accounted for the remaining third of the decline."
-
Quick hits for Jan. 10, 2008
Tweet Share on Facebook January 10, 2008 Comment1) FOB (Friend of the Blog) John Tamny of RealClearMarkets gives the shiv to the idea of fiscal stimulus.
2) Larry Kudlow, another great FOB, expertly dissects the New Hampshire primary for its economic meaning.
3) Don Boudreaux over at Café Hayek takes issue with the idea of the "disappearing middle class."
