Why Supply-Siders Will Rally to McCain

February 4, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (34)
Republican presidential hopeful John McCain campaigns for the White House.

Republican presidential hopeful John McCain campaigns for the White House.

After talking with loads of economic conservatives in recent days about the prospects of John McCain as the GOP nominee, I have concluded that in the end many will actually support him with a moderate degree of enthusiasm. (Steve Forbes, by the way, already has voiced his support.) Here are the reasons:

1) The Bush tax cuts. The 2001 and 2003 reductions will expire at the end of 2010, and McCain has personally promised several top conservatives that he will go all out to get them extended.

2) Earmark reform. McCain has a vendetta against earmarks. While pork projects are not a huge part of the $3 trillion federal budget, maybe $25 billion to $30 billion, they act as a "force multiplier" of sorts to boost spending throughout the budget. A member of Congress who objects to some new spending plan might not get the project or perhaps will be "persuaded" to go along with a spending bill by getting pork shoveled his or her way.

3) Spending. One supply-sider suggested to me that maybe it's best to view McCain as part of a Bush-McCain continuum. Bush cut taxes but didn't do much about spending, and now McCain will cut spending and hold the line on tax increases. Together, McBush makes a good conservative president.

4) Phil Gramm. If McCain is elected president, the former U.S. senator from Texas will almost assuredly be the new treasury secretary—a big step up, in the view of many conservatives, from Bush's picks.

5) Trade. McCain is a free trader, and open global trade is the bedrock fundamental underlying the amazing global economic expansion.

6) Healthcare. Although even close allies will readily admit McCain is no policy wonk, his healthcare plan—if McCain can fully grasp and explain it—is one with loads of appeal to free-market conservatives.

7) Hillarycare, Obamacare. On the other hand, conservatives are coming around to the view that a Democratic president with a Democratic Congress will create a massive, government-run healthcare system that will differ from what we see in Canada and the European Union only in minor detail. And once this new, expensive entitlement is in place, conservatives worry they will never get rid of it or even substantially modify it. More than one person told me about fearing that nationalized healthcare will end up transforming the Republican Party into an American version of today's left-slouching Tory Party in Britain.

Of course, economic conservatives still have big concerns. McCain is no supply-sider. In fact, he seems to have bought into Rubinomics, which sees lower deficits, not lower taxes, as the key to growth. Another big worry is that McCain will agree to a tax increase as part of a Democratic plan to reform Social Security. They also worry about McCain's love of a cap-and-trade climate emissions plan, which is, basically, an energy tax. And even though McCain seems to realize tax increases can hurt economic growth, he has so far been unable to forcefully articulate why tax cuts are good for economic growth. At least, that is the perception.

Tags:
economics,
2008 presidential election,
John McCain,
economy,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (34)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Romney's a liberal. It is absolutely and 100% impossible for anyone other than a liberal to get elected governor of Massachusetts. Now that he's running for President he claims to be a conservative, but that's because he'll lie and say anything to get elected. Nothing conservative has come out of Massachusetts in over 100 years - why would Rombot be any different?

pfish of DC 2:22PM February 05, 2008

As all the baby boomers retire, health care sooner or later becomes their #1 priority. The Democrats are offering universal health care. that will lead to a single payer system liek Canada/EU. Why would Americans want to have a single payer Canada/Eu system of health care once one of the Democrats puts it in place? Simple, they would rather ask the United States Goverment to spend a couple hundred thousand dollars to keep them alive, compared to asking an insurance company to spend 200K of THEIR money to keep you alive. Besides once they decline, how much fight do you realy have in you to sue? Your DIEING. A few delays in court and you can't continue or complain. The private insurance companys have rigged the game. Once they deny your claim, then you become a nail that disease/death hammers down for them.

Continuing with the private insurance debacle will only insure that the Republican party is kept out of power until all the baby boomers die. 40+years from now.

howden of WA 7:05AM February 05, 2008

I am a long-time supply sider having had the privilege of being a student of Art Laffer's during his time at USC. I am also a former

Navy pilot, Vietnam Vet, and a lifelong supporter of Ronald Reagan.

I cast my first vote for Reagan for governor in 1968. I have NEVER failed to cast a vote since that day, but I am seriously contemplating

staying home in November if McCain is the Republican nominee. The

only thing that could possibly induce me to vote for him is the potential

damage to the Supreme Court due to a Democrat presidency.

How sad that the Reagan Revolution has come to this.

DOUG JONES

Santa Ana, CA

Doug Jones of CA 3:30AM February 05, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement