An Analysis of Obama's Trade Bill

February 28, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Two British economists don't care for the Patriot Employer Act, a bill introduced last August by Barack Obama and several other Democrats. The legislation would provide a tax credit equal to 1 percent of taxable income to employers that meet a number of requirements, such as keeping steady the ratio of full-time workers in the United States to full-time workers outside the United States and maintaining their corporate headquarters here. (I notice that my old pals at the left-of-center Angry Bear site also don't seem to think much of the idea.) The critique of the Brits is as follows:

Companies ought to decide the location of their headquarters and their domestic and foreign employment levels without being subjected to fiscal incentives. It is also unenforceable. Foreign branches of domestic companies, whose workers count as employees of the parent, would be changed to subsidiaries, whose workers no longer count as employees of the parent. Companies ever headquartered in the United States would be sold to shell companies or shut down and immediately reopened with a different name and legal identity, headquartered abroad. Let Commerce Department lawyers try to use corporate DNA fingerprinting to determine the ancestry of these new corporations! Unfortunately, idiotic legislation that is unenforceable is not harmless—it breeds contempt for laws and institutions.

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If, what the Brits suggest might happen,and this legislature is passed anytime soon, then our United States Of America's congress is not performing their responsibilities. We, the people, will have to impeach them for even thinking of an unenforceable law. It is a waste of time and money . They haven't done much for us anyway..they just like to hear themselves talk.

Proud American of TX 2:08PM March 03, 2008

I'm curious how the ratio of full-time US workers to full-time EU will work out for the EADS' air tanker contract. http://www.star-telegram.com/business/story/504943.html. That $35-100 Billion deal and loss of ~9000 American jobs is being ignored. (Don't try to say the EADS front, Northrup Grumman, will get equal American jobs to Boeing). Let's have a big cheer for globalization.

George of CO 2:00PM March 03, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement