Recession Politics Will Push Massive Bailout Plan

March 4, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

"Look, if we have a recession, it's not the end of the world," is how one well-known economy bear succinctly summed up things in a recent chat with me. A simple point but one worth keeping in mind these days. Superinvestor Warren Buffett, who does think the economy is in recession, is also keeping any downturn in perspective: "Over time, my children are going to live better than I do, although they don't believe it."

Indeed, recessions are hardly an indictment of capitalism or free markets. We'll always have downturns from time to time as long as workers, owners, consumers, and investors are imperfect humans rather than superintelligent machines. That said, I think we have four possible economic paths in front of us right now:

1) Keep cutting rates. This seems to be what the Fed is going to do in order to contain the spreading credit crunch and avert a really nasty, 1982-style downturn. Of course, that strategy—which the European Union is not buying into—is absolutely killing the dollar and fueling further speculation in commodities. That, in turn, is actually boosting U.S. inflation, hurting the purchasing power of consumers. (Inflation is a tax of sorts.)

And while lower short-term rates will help homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages and home equity lines of credit, it doesn't seem to be helping fixed mortgages rates, which are at a three-month high. Now the Fed hopes that the softening labor market will help bring down inflation and that commodity prices will stabilize. But, to use the Fed's new favorite phrase, "adverse feedback" effects seem to be sapping its rate-cutting strategy of its effectiveness.

2) Do nothing. That is the preferred path of many Capital Commerce readers. Let the market correct and provide a stark warning to future real estate speculators on Main Street and financial engineers on Wall Street. But listen, folks, this is America. We don't do pain, especially in an election season. I think this strategy is a nonstarter.

3) Go for growth. One way people deal with weak real income growth is by borrowing against or selling assets, like stocks and homes. But as JPMorgan economists Bruce Kasman notes, "At a time when both stock prices and housing wealth have been declining, households may be reluctant to sell assets. This is another way of saying that wealth effects on consumer spending are turning negative."

We could turn that around by slashing the capital-gains tax to, say, 5 percent for people making over $250,000 and zero for everybody else. That would increase the after-tax return on housing and stocks and boost prices. Such a bold move might well reignite the economic expansion, which would also alleviate the housing crisis. Consider this: An analysis of the economy from 2001 to 2006 by Allen Sinai, chief economist of Decisions Economics, found that if neither of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts had been enacted, U.S. economic growth would have been 0.7 percent less each year and the unemployment rate would have been 1.2 percentage points higher over 2001 to 2006 than it actually was. But the economy really didn't take off until the 2003 capital-gains cut. Unfortunately, this option is about as unlikely as the do-nothing option because of election-year politics and the Democratic congressional majority.

4) Settle for a bailout. All signs seem to be pointing in this direction. Alan Blinder, former Fed vice chair, has proposed a $300 billion plan for Uncle Sam to refinance 1 million to 2 million mortgages to stem the deluge in home foreclosures and prop up home prices. Now I know Hank Paulson has scowled at the idea of a game-ending bailout, but Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chief Sheila Bair says the White House has not ruled it out. I think Team Bush is giving Bernanke and his rate cuts, as well as the fiscal stimulus package, a bit more time to bite before embracing a return to the New Deal. Still, Alex Pollock, former chief executive officer of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, recently told U.S. News that it is "virtually certain" that lawmakers will act.

Tags:
recession,
economy,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's sad that people are still wedded to the idea that government will solve the problems of 300+ million people. Markets go up and markets go down. This is the nature of markets. Attempting to have a bunch of elected officials try to "fix" things can only make matters worse because no one really knows what exactly needs to be fixed. Sure, on the surface the credit markets and housing are not doing so well now, but these are only two facets of a multitrillion dollar economy and none of its problems have so far leaked into the rest of the economy.

" "The surest guide to the decline of a civilization is the unwillingness of the wealthy and powerful to tax themselves for the common good." "

Umm, Dennis, this comment is by far one of the stupidest comments I have ever heard a leftist say. No one will be willing to tax themselves. That's why governments do it. Anyway, the rich taxing themselves is not a surest way to ending a civilization. The surest way to ending a civilization is by surrendering all of your freedoms to government to have them "do" something.

Chris of AZ 7:48PM March 06, 2008

Free-market ideologues got us into this mess and they remain in control of the government. Since they're ideologically committed to the idea that Big Government is bad, it seems unlikely that they would accept a massive New Deal-type of bailout for mortgages.

Richard Dixon of FL 2:35PM March 05, 2008

Two points: Bernanke as well as other members of the Fed Open Market Committee have pointedly reminded the country that the Fed has a strong commitment to maintaining stable prices and currently the core PCI is above their target of 2%. They are probably telling the country that only one more cut in interest rates should be expected.

Secondly, it is curious how USN&WR columnists are addicted to the discredited Republican economic theory of trickle down economics, i.e the only way to save the economy is to reduce taxes on the wealthy. Reducing the capital gains tax further to only 5% for the wealthy- its elimination for those with lower incomes is economically meaningless- would do nothing to solve the current economic problems which are caused by counter party risk, the unwillingness of banks to lend for fear of default. In stead it is good to remermber the wise words of Edward Gibbon in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, "The surest guide to the decline of a civilization is the unwillingness of the wealthy and powerful to tax themselves for the common good."

Dennis Waller of WA 1:46PM March 05, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement