Should Bernanke Apologize for Saving the Market?

March 24, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

"Maybe Bernanke can go to Capitol Hill and also tell Grassley how he just saved the stock market," is how one miffed Wall Street pro reacted to news that Charles Grassley, the top-ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, wants his staff to look into the Federal Reserve-backed acquisition of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase. Grassley said last week that he wanted to make sure top executives didn't profit at the expense of shareholders.

But even more irksome to some was this query by Grassley: "Is there any upside for taxpayers in the Bear Stearns deal?" Well, a repeat of Black Monday—a real possibility if the Fed had done nothing and the Bear deal had never happened—would have meant a nearly $3 trillion loss in market value. Just a guess here, but that probably isn't good news for taxpayers—or anybody else. So what is behind Grassley's actions? A couple of possibilities:

1) With markets convulsing and the Fed dancing as fast as it can, this was Grassley's way of reminding all involved that Congress still matters and has a big role to play as the housing crisis continues. Plus, as one Washington observer put it, "If there are five guys on Capitol Hill willing to make an issue of this, Grassley is one of them."

2) To some people, it might look as if Washington is scrambling to help Wall Street with all sorts of largess courtesy of the Fed but pretty much ignoring homeowners. Grassley's statement is a reminder that Washington isn't cutting checks with no strings attached.

Tags:
JPMorgan Chase,
economy,
Chuck Grassley,
Ben Bernanke,
Federal Reserve

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The United States Government is capitalizing on a comprehensional failure of the human mind – the inability to fully grasp the magnitude of large numbers. Upon hearing numbers beyond a few thousand our brains interpret it as, “Wow, that’s a big number!” with no tangible image to relay exactly how big. So, let’s start with a One Dollar Bill. We can understand $1.00, right?

According to the United States treasury, a One Dollar Bill has a thickness of 0.0043 inches. One thousand One Dollar Bills would be one thousand times thicker -- 4.3 inches.

One million is one thousand thousands, so the thickness of $1,000,000 is 4300 inches. Converting to feet and this becomes 358.3 feet, an American football field.

One billion -- $1,000,000,000 is one thousand times thicker still or 358,333.3 feet. This is 67.866 miles, the driving distance from New York City to Milford CT.

One Trillion is one thousand billions – one trillion One Dollar Bills stacked one on top of another is 67,866 miles. This would circumnavigate the globe 2.73 times.

The proposed 700 Billion Dollar bailout alone would be a stack of One Dollar Bills stretching 47,506.2 miles, or 1.90 times around the globe.

A stack of One Dollar Bills totaling the current national debt cap of 10.6 trillion dollars would go around the equator 28.93 times. The proposed cap of 11.3 trillion dollars would go around 30.85 times.

Is creating a debt that is the equivalent of a stack of One Dollar Bills rounding planet 31 times a responsible act?

JP in USA of GA 11:18PM September 21, 2008

...with this, & all the rest happening worldwide, "Atlas" is indeed "shrugging"...

Pelagic of AZ 6:52PM April 18, 2008

These Wall Street suits and Bush go on about the free-market and sneer at welfare social programs for the genuinely needy, yet seem to think they should be given welfare by the taxpayer?

The biggest benefit scroungers are not in the inner cities but in the boardrooms of Wall Street. Wall Street are a bunch of socialists who want the nanny state to pay all their bills (but Wall Street keeps all the profits, eh?)

Why are we giving welfare to the stinking rich?

Why are we rewarding incompetence?

At least Grassley and Ron Paul are proper conservatives, unlike Bush and co who are disgusting hypocrites who have their snouts in the trough..

Gary Wintle 12:01AM April 06, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement