'Save Us!' Says Merrill Lynch

March 27, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

Wall Street has been supporting Democrats in greater numbers since the Clinton era. How to reconcile that with its professed belief in the wonder-working power of free markets? Maybe there is really nothing to reconcile when you have the top economist at one of the country's premier investment firms making recommendations like the one made by David Rosenberg of Merrill Lynch (boldface mine):

To alleviate credit market paralysis, the outright purchase of illiquid mortgage-backed securities (MBS) is probably required, and could employ government-backed fiscal action. So far, government-backed plans have relied on just voluntary actions by loan-servicers to modify existing mortgage loans, resulting in low participation. The Federal Reserve itself could buy some of these securities, but the Fed alone cannot unclog the congestion in the credit markets, in our opinion.

The US Treasury, under the auspices of the White House, has rejected plans calling for government intervention. However, a combination of the quick demise of Bear Stearns and the domino effect this could have had on our financial system, plus home prices still in free fall, has increased calls for government involvement. Eventually the Bush Administration may have to change its attitude.

However, more aggressive monetary or fiscal policy responses will not end the economic recession, stop home prices from falling, or reverse the dramatic de-leveraging in the financial system. Bolder Washington initiatives can, at best, only soften the negative impact on the economy and possibly provide for somewhat of an orderly unwind of credit conditions.

My take: The more Uncle Sammy helps Wall Street, the more pressure to help Main Street. Hillary got the meme right in her speech of a few days ago (boldface mine):

Last week when it became clear Wall Street was on the brink of a financial meltdown, the Fed and the administration sprang into action. The Fed extended a $30 billion lifeline to prevent Bear Stearns from imploding and took unprecedented action to provide tens of billions of dollars in credit for other struggling investment banks as well. Homeowners, on the other hand, have received next to no assistance. Well, let's be clear. When families are losing their homes, that's also a financial crisis. When people's greatest source of wealth is losing its worth, as college costs and healthcare costs and food and gas prices shoot up, that's a financial crisis too. When "for sale" signs line streets across our country, when cities and towns are struggling with the costs of foreclosed properties, that is also a financial crisis.

Tags:
Merrill Lynch,
Federal Reserve

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I rarely participate in these comments, but I really have to share my story with 1 company which has tremendously helped me. I just turned 74, many obstacles have come in the way of my retirement including a divorce a few years ago which really hurt me financially, to be honest I had this feeling that my savings and SS income were not going to be enough. Months and months of research and dealing with big banks - nothing but a big headache and they wanted to charge an arm and leg - I was considering a standard home equity loan but then I started reading about reverse mortgages. Long story short, i found this company while searching online - reverse mortgage lenders direct - they were able to automatically compare lenders for me and quote me a fantastic quote. I am not saying you need to do a reverse mortgage (for me this has been excellent and recommendable) but if you do here is their number 877 700 0534 - you can find the site online search for reverse mortgage lenders direct.

stephenwilliams2345 of NY 1:59AM May 30, 2012

The United States Government is capitalizing on a comprehensional failure of the human mind – the inability to fully grasp the magnitude of large numbers. Upon hearing numbers beyond a few thousand our brains interpret it as, “Wow, that’s a big number!” with no tangible image to relay exactly how big. So, let’s start with a One Dollar Bill. We can understand $1.00, right?

According to the United States treasury, a One Dollar Bill has a thickness of 0.0043 inches. One thousand One Dollar Bills would be one thousand times thicker -- 4.3 inches.

One million is one thousand thousands, so the thickness of $1,000,000 is 4300 inches. Converting to feet and this becomes 358.3 feet, an American football field.

One billion -- $1,000,000,000 is one thousand times thicker still or 358,333.3 feet. This is 67.866 miles, the driving distance from New York City to Milford CT.

One Trillion is one thousand billions – one trillion One Dollar Bills stacked one on top of another is 67,866 miles. This would circumnavigate the globe 2.73 times.

The proposed 700 Billion Dollar bailout alone would be a stack of One Dollar Bills stretching 47,506.2 miles, or 1.90 times around the globe.

A stack of One Dollar Bills totaling the current national debt cap of 10.6 trillion dollars would go around the equator 28.93 times. The proposed cap of 11.3 trillion dollars would go around 30.85 times.

Is creating a debt that is the equivalent of a stack of One Dollar Bills rounding planet 31 times a responsible act?

JP of GA 11:29PM September 21, 2008

Exactly....in terms of me not providing a reference to my "statistics"! WHY is it that Gerri Willis of CNN and/or any other reporter who is reporting on the mortgage crisis only seems to cover the surface and NEVER give the full picture or truely do an investigation to get to the details. Sure there are people getting foreclosed upon and there is an increase. Coming from an accounting background, where executives showed me a thing or two about how to "report numbers", you can make any number look good or bad just in the presentation. If there was only 1 foreclosure in all the US and 2 the next year...the news would jump all over that as a 100% increase in the foreclosure rates. My question becomes, with the increase in total number of mortgages over the past few years...what is the ratio of foreclosures to performing mortgages now as compared to the same ratio in 2006, 2005, 2004 etc...... My point being the big banks are not suffering because of mortgage foreclosures, they are suffering because of the press perpetuating the negative creating a psycological freeze of the credit markets. Someone, correct me here! Someone provide us some true statistics! Resolution to market crisis....easy... stop all the bad press and get some decent reporting.

Teresa Anaya of TX 9:45PM April 15, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement