Obama and (Even) Higher Capital-Gains Taxes

April 22, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (60)

Barack Obama intends, if elected, to nearly double the capital-gains-tax rate to 28 percent—higher than the 20 percent rate when President Clinton left office—from its current rate of 15 percent. But capital-gains taxes may be going even higher. Consider this: There are plenty of Democrats, such as failed White House contender John Edwards, who want capital to be taxed at the same rate as income. And since they tend to be the same folks who want to repeal the Bush cut in the top marginal income tax rate, such a move would push rates for capital-gains taxes to a sky-high 40 percent. That would be as high as they have been since before the landmark 1978 cut in the capital-gains tax.

In a recent chat, Austan Goolsbee, Obama's economic adviser, told me that the candidate was not in favor of equalizing income and capital-gains rates. Yet consider this: Obama says he intends to, at minimum, make the budget deficit no worse. But in my conversation with Goolsbee, it was clear that the campaign is underestimating the size of the 2009 budget deficit by $100 billion or more. Goolsbee was unaware of private-sector estimates putting the deficit at half a trillion dollars and climbing, thanks to the weak economy.

To have a revenue-neutral budget under that scenario, Obama will have to either cut back on his spending plans or raise taxes even higher. And given that a President Obama would be dealing with even larger Democratic majorities in Congress, it would seem logical that higher capital-gains and/or higher income-tax rates would be a definite possibility.

Tags:
Austan Goolsbee,
corporate taxes,
economics,
2008 presidential election,
taxes,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (60)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ive never met a truly wealthy person where someone in their history, the one that came up with the large sums of wealth were not illegal or immoral somewhere somehow. You cant possibly EARM 100,000,000 a year, that's just legal theft from either the stockholder or someone else. If you own your own business, what compensation you get is your business, but publicly held corporations should have a absoluot paycap of 50x average employee wages. And dont give me that BS about who pays your wages, you can say the same thing about the mafia.

Les of AZ 5:30AM April 20, 2009

"oh no! The richest people...."

Obama's definition of "rich" gets lower and lower and lower.

BTW, are any poor people hiring you, or is it the rich?

I see a lot of ENVY. Perhaps while you chose to sit around and take drugs, others chose to take 8 years of college and have a good career. Instead of being envious or coveting, go out and make your own million! It can be done in this country if you aren't taxed too much.

susan of WA 9:31PM November 14, 2008

I'm puzzled by the whole capital gains tax thing. I consider us middle income people; we have investments, sure, but we're not rolling in dough. I am a retired teacher and my husband a government-employed engineer. We paid more tax for 2007 than my entire pension. We were told it was because of capital gains. Was this because our broker was churning our accounts? I don't even know where to go to find out.

I have a financial advisor, but he just makes noise about how glad I should be that I'm making money. (Although it seems to be going away faster than we make it.)

I believe people should pay their taxes. I'd just like to be able to understand what I am paying on.

Mary of OH 3:04PM October 15, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement