Economy Refuses to Tank. Bears Weep

May 2, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

To quote bloody-and-beaten-but-still-standing boxer Jake LaMotta (portrayed by Robert De Niro) from the 1980 film Raging Bull, "Is that all you got!" The U.S. economy, supposedly sinking into the worst economic slump in a generation, lost a skimpy 20,000 jobs last month even though some analysts were looking for losses closer to 100,000. As economist Robert Brusca put it this morning: "Job losses are way below the recession norm for this point of business cycle (if this is recession). Many things do not really add up...for the recession forecasters.... Is it still a recession? Was it ever?"

And the unemployment rate actually dipped to 5.0 percent from 5.1 percent in March. So far, the economy has lost jobs for four straight months: down 76,000, 83,000, 81,000 and now 20,000. Back in 2001, the economy lost 30,000, 281,000, 44,000, and 128,000 as the economy weakened. And in 1990, the economy lost 42,000, 280,000, 82,000, and 161,000 as the economy tanked. Way back in 1981, jobs losses were 36,000, 87,000, 100,000, and 209,000.

Now keep in mind that once the unemployment rate looks to have peaked, the Fed will probably move to raise rates. So see how this virtuous circle works for you: Stocks, already up 10 percent since early March, continue to rise and replace the household wealth lost to the housing bust. The dollar continues to strengthen, helping bring down food and energy inflation. That bolsters real incomes and consumer spending. Americans, feeling richer and more confident, finally begin to move back into the housing market. The 25-year boom continues.

Tags:
recession,
economy,
stock market,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I must agree with Mises and Sam, two of your previous commenters. This article is superficial at best (ignorant at worst). But, at least your man Larry Kudlow and CNBC like you! Long Live the next bull market! Let's take the S&P to 1460!

Matt of DC 4:08PM May 05, 2008

I think this article makes it clear that the author's knowledge of economic fundamentals is severely lacking.

Comparing jobs data from the previous recession yields little to no insight into the current environment for many reasons, not least of which include:

1) Since 2001-02 recession we've experienced a "jobless recovery," indicating that US labor markets have remained closer to their equilibrium while economic growth (GDP) has improved (likely due to productivity increases and consumer-focused tax cuts)

2) The US economy has continued its transition from a manufacturing economy to a service sector economy, completely skewing the validity of jobs data in contributing to a determination of economic strength. This is largely because productivity is more important to economic growth than simply counting the number of jobs (or lack thereof). Therefore, while we may be currently losing less jobs overall than in the previous recession, the jobs now being cut may have a greater impact on productivity (right now there are many high-skill, high-paying, and probably high-productivity jobs being cut).

Oh, and nevermind the fact that equity markets and the dollar have not yet begun to accurately price in the full effect of bank losses and credit market tightening.

Mr. Pethokoukis should probably stick to Soviet politics and American history.

Mises of PA 3:08PM May 05, 2008

maybe you can educate me. The housing bubble has burst and the myth that owning a house equals good investment is gone and it will never come back.

most of the new demand in the future would have to come from immigration but that is tight and broken as ever. so where will the new demand for houses come from ??

sam of GA 2:38PM May 05, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement