Goolsbee vs. Holtz-Eakin: When Advisers Attack!

July 23, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

I just got back from a think-tank debate on taxes between McCain economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee. (I would say Goolsbee won if for no reason other than he came armed with an effective PowerPoint presentation while Holtz-Eakin decided to kick it old school. He just talked.) Here are a few observations and notes:

1) Goolsbee said McCainomics "not just repeats the [Bush economic mistakes] but magnifies them. [John] McCain's tax cuts are twice as big and twice as regressive."

2) Goolsbee argued that the so-called middle-class squeeze is not just the result of our economic woes but the cause of them. Thus, greater income equality will create more economic growth.

3) Goolsbee said that anyone who does not have a kid or pay income taxes gets no benefits from the McCain tax plan.

4) Goolsbee said that Barack Obama would "not increase, and very likely" cut, the budget deficit. In response to a question, he said that at the end of Obama's first term, the budget deficit-to-GDP ratio would be less than 2.5 percent. (I think he was ballparking that, though.)

5) Holtz-Eakin said that Obama's $1,000 tax credit won't help a person who doesn't have a job. That is why the campaign is focusing on corporate tax cuts and reducing healthcare costs for business. That would free up money for hiring and wage growth.

6) Holtz-Eakin said "there will be no real wage growth until we get healthcare costs under control."

7) Holtz-Eakin noted that workers bear 70 percent of the brunt of our high corporate taxes.

8) Holtz-Eakin thinks the McCain tax cuts will recoup 20 percent of lost revenue through higher economic growth.

9) Holtz-Eakin said there has never been a successful effort to reduce the budget deficit without also generating stronger economic growth.

My final take: The media are going to interpret the data from the Tax Policy Center, the folks who ran the debate, as meaning that neither McCain nor Obama can balance the budget, with McCain's plan about a third more profligate. But I also sense that neither campaign thinks the deficit is a big issue compared with concerns about economic growth and help to people struggling financially from high gas prices, flat wages, and falling home prices.

Tags:
economics,
2008 presidential election,
Barack Obama,
John McCain,
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Huh,

Obama has already indicated that his intended goals are 0 sum. You up the taxes on the rich (250k +) by 5% and you can lower it on the masses by 5% and guess what they are both getting taxed about the same percentage out of their earnings and we are back at the same point.

This whole Republican trickle down lie is quite the joke. Think about it from a logical stand point. If I Mr. Normal American are unable to buy a brand new HD TV because I am broke due to excessive taxes and non-existent wage growth the money is not going to trickle back up-hill.

The rich don't get rich by trickle the money downhill they get rich but sucking off the bottom. Or in other words they are Bottom Feeders.

TimL of 3:15PM October 22, 2008

I find it interesting, based on your points, that Goolsbee does not address how higher taxes will lead to economic growth. In fact, Goolsbee does not even address how his boss' proposal to increase taxes will make the income distribution in this country more equitable.

Chris of AZ 10:56AM July 24, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement