Why Oil Really Fell Today—and Could Keep Falling

August 4, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (37)

Oil slipped below $120 at one point today and now overall is down nearly 20 percent from its July high of near $150. But I don't think the drop had much to do with the usual suspects—a weak consumer spending report, less risk that Tropical Storm Edouard will smack the Gulf Coast—which will surely be mentioned in the financial pages tomorrow.

I think the drop had everything to do with reports this weekend that MIT chemist Daniel Nocera seems to have discovered a cheap—by a factor of 1,000—and easy way to separate hydrogen from water. Scientific American puts the advance in context:

According to John Turner, a research fellow at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo., who was not involved in the research, the discovery could reduce the need for platinum in a conventional electrolyzer. He believes it could also play a role in a future large-scale hydrogen generator, which would collect the energy from sunlight in huge fields and then run that electric current through water to produce vast amounts of hydrogen to meet, for example, the demand from a future fleet of hydrogen-powered vehicles. "That's what his advance is pointing towards," he says, "finding an alternative catalyst that will allow us to do oxygen evolution (breaking the bonds of water or H2O and forming oxygen) in concert with hydrogen" on a grand scale.

Apparently Nocera believes that this technology could become widespread within a decade. Check this out: "In a future hydrogen economy, he imagines, a house would function much like a leaf does, using the sun to power household electricity and to break down water into fuel—a sort of artificial photosynthesis."

Bottom line: I think research into alternative energy technology is moving ahead way faster than the Washington politicians realize. (But we still need to exploit oil and coal and nuclear to bridge the gap from a hydrocarbon to post-hydrocarbon economy.) And it is all happening without spending trillions of dollars in taxpayer money for energy-themed Manhattan Projects or Apollo programs. This possible breakthrough came from MIT's Solar Revolution Project, which was funded to the tune of $10 million by telecommunications entrepreneur Arunas Chesonis. Heroic capitalism strikes again.

Tags:
oil

Reader Comments Read all comments (37)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The problem with this "great idea" is that solar power is still very expensive. Several breakthroughs appear to be close, but even then direct use of the electric power produced would seem to make more sense.

jack Dixon of FL 3:57AM August 10, 2008

I would love to get Picenns take on this subject Can we get his opinion? PLEASE! He is the guru on on altrnate energy.

philip Lirel of GA 8:46PM August 09, 2008

Half the time, we are told that water is a precious resource, and that there is not enough to go around. World Wars will occur over water. More people, less water.

Where I live, the population seems to be rising faster than our ability to deliver water. Everyone must conserve. Don't waste it, there is hardly enough to go around as it is. The price is going through the sky already, in order to force everyone to use less.

Now the dimbats want to use the water to create energy? This will result in the cost of water to the consumer to rise by a factor likely to exceed 1000%. You want to wash your clothes? Take a shower? Fill your swimming pool for a hot summer? You better hope you are at least a US Senator, or you won't be able to afford any of those things.

John of UT 3:23PM August 07, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement