Energy: What Would Reagan Do?

August 6, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

This tidbit on energy from Ronald Reagan's 1980 debate with Jimmy Carter perfectly fits in with today's energy crisis. It's really uncanny:

I do believe that this nation has been portrayed for too long a time to the people as being energy-poor when it is energy-rich. The coal that the President mentioned—yes, we have it—and yet one-eighth of our total coal resources is not being utilized at all right now. The mines are closed down; there are 22,000 miners out of work. Most of this is due to regulations which either interfere with the mining of it or prevent the burning of it: With our modern technology, yes, we can burn our coal within the limits of the Clean Air Act. I think, as technology improves, we'll be able to do even better with that. The other thing is that we have only leased out—begun to explore—2% of our outer continental shelf for oil, where it is believed, by everyone familiar with that fuel and that source of energy, that there are vast supplies yet to be found. Our Government has, in the last year or so, taken out of multiple use millions of acres of public lands that once were—well, they were public lands subject to multiple use—exploration for minerals and so forth. It is believed that probably 70% of the potential oil in the United States is probably hidden in those lands, and no one is allowed to even go and explore to find out if it is there. This is particularly true of the recent efforts to shut down part of Alaska. Nuclear power: There were 36 power plants planned in this country. And let me add the word safety; it must be done with the utmost of safety. But 32 of those have given up and canceled their plans to build, and again, because Government regulations and permits, and so forth, take—make it take—more than twice as long to build a nuclear plant in the United States as it does to build one in Japan or in Western Europe. We have the sources here. We are energy rich, and coal is one of the great potentials we have.

Tags:
energy,
Ronald Reagan,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

by the way im a 37 year old male who never finsh high school and i can see the answear to our problem why can them college grad. from goverment and all them special intrest people see it too(sorry for my grammer)

cesar uranga of AZ 5:57PM October 04, 2008

the drill now plan is a brige to energy indipendance.if we start now even if it takes ten years.(i dont think it will take that long)like obama says.prices will drop buying us time to get there.we all want 0 edmission car,we all want to save the planetbut for now we need lower price fuel to keep the economy going.our economy is run by fuel.i like paying 1.00 for milk but when fuel rises then transportaation if milk,bread,beans,meat ex. rises as well, house prices rise couse of transportation of materia. everything is govern by the price of fuel.WE NEED TO DRILL FOR NOW! to keep the economy going.we can not continue to let other nations(opec)venesuela iraq,mexico,iran run our economy. we are hurting.we need do something know and until we have the tecnoly go 100% enegy independant witch we dont now, we need to drill and get control of our economy back if not we will be at the mercy of all of enemies that control the price

cesar uranga of AZ 5:53PM October 04, 2008

"We can NOT drill our way out of this problem; we only prolong the inevitable. There is only so much oil in the ground."

Yes, because we know that you liberals know where all of the oil is. Please. Our energy woes are self-inflicted. While we squabble over energy, other countries such as Russia, China, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Iraq (Iraq!!), Iran, Nigeria, Angola, etc., etc., etc. continue to move forward with providing the world's energy needs. This foolishness has got to stop. The only way this is going to get resolved is by voting out Democrats who are beholden to the environmental lobby, who are not environmentalists at all, but, as the WSJ calls them, enviromaniacs.

Chris of AZ 2:40PM August 07, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement