U.S. Corporate Taxes: Still Second-Highest on Planet Earth

August 15, 2008 RSS Feed Print

I feel like doing my best John McEnroe impression here: "You cannot be serious!" Anyone who dismisses the new corporate tax numbers is not serious about competing with the EU and Rising Asia. Here are some key results of two new OECD studies on corporate taxes (as interpreted by the Tax Foundation and slightly paraphrased by me):

1) For the 17th consecutive year, the average rate of corporate taxes in non-U.S. countries fell while the U.S. corporate tax rate stayed the same. As a result, the overall U.S. corporate tax rate is now 50 percent higher than the OECD average.

2) The United States continues to have the second-highest combined federal-state corporate tax rate among industrialized countries at 39.3 percent.

3) The OECD data show that nine of the 30 OECD member nations have lower corporate tax rates in 2008 than in 2007, including Canada, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, the United Kingdom, Italy, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, and Iceland.

4) This year, Asian countries have been very aggressive on the tax front. China's new 25 percent corporate tax rate, down from 33 percent, went into effect in January. Meanwhile, the Korean government has announced that it will cut its corporate rate from 25 percent to 22 percent.

5) The empirical evidence from the new OECD study suggests that "investment is adversely affected by corporate taxation through the user cost of capital," meaning the after-tax return on investment.

6) The OECD study also found that statutory corporate tax rates have a negative effect on firms that are in the "process of catching up with the productivity performance of the best-practice firms." This suggests that "lowering statutory corporate tax rates can lead to particularly large productivity gains in firms that are dynamic and profitable, i.e. those that can make the largest contribution to GDP growth."

International Corporate Tax Rates chart
Tags:
corporate taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Since the US has numerous special tax preferences for corporations and businesses it collects the fourth lowest tax revenue from corporations as a share of GDP among all Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Countries.

Kevin of CT 10:58AM February 03, 2009

Title of article is US Corporate Taxes Second Highest In World.

False. The title implies this is what they are actually paying, which they are not. It's more like 3.5$.

I work for one of the top 100 best us corps, they say, to work for and this is what I've seen.

Past 10 years average salary increase 2.5%, no that is not keeping up with inflation. Oh, BTW I am in a good field, computer science with a masters degree and I can't even keep my salary up to real inflation.

At corporate headquarters we have roughly 15% of Indian workers and another perhaps 10% working in India. Taxes are not the predominant reason corporations are outsourcing.

Our pension plan has been frozen, luckly we did get a portable plan but it is far inferion by any measurment.

Our health care plans went to one choice and the co-pays and deductables have been increasing exponentially. Our retiree benifit was locked at the companies contribution limit of 1987 so the co will kick in roughly $300 in today's dollars.

No, they don't owe me anything and I'm just lucky to have a job. But don't try to tell me us corporations are getting screwed. Facts is facts and I just don't understand how any middle class person feels that we should lower the corporate tax rate and taxes for the rich for that matter, hoping that trickle down economics and deregulation is what is good for workers.

If you don't start doing the hard work of researching the truth and becoming a critical thinker you will pay a heavy price.

sfsob of TN 1:17AM October 29, 2008

Unless we return to an export centric nation, the INDIVIDUAL will pay the taxes regardless because the cost of doing business is passed onto the consumer of products and services. If you believe this to be true the question is:

Where are the tax regulations and associated breaks/loopholes best applied?

Rob Park of MA 4:18PM August 28, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement