McCain’s (Almost) August Surprise

August 19, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Call it The Game Changing Moment That Wasn't. For just a wee bit, it seemed like John McCain was going to blow away Barack Obama's piddly (by comparison) $1,000 tax cut for dual-income families. Here is McCain at the Saddleback forum on Saturday: "Let's have—keep taxes low. Let's give every family in America a $7,000 tax credit for every child they have."

Well, that's one way to deal with the "tax cuts for the rich" slam against McCainomics. Previously, McCain had proposed doubling the dependent exemption to $7,000. (About an $800 tax cut for a family of four.) But considering that the current kiddie credit is $1,000, the new plan—particularly if it was a refundable tax credit—would be quite an upgrade, and just what many social conservatives have been pushing for. (But supply-siders? Not so much. In today's WSJ, Peter Ferrara calls such refundable tax credits "tax welfare.")

Actually, it would be more like a massive government subsidy for families or, depending on how you view things, equitable compensation to parents financially sacrificing to create the next generation of innovators and Social Security contributors. (Full disclosure: Under such a tax plan with my gaggle of kids, I would be entering the Forbes 400 list at No. 379, just ahead of Yankees owner George Steinbrenner and Ultimate Fighting tycoon Lorenzo Fertitta. Thanks Uncle Sammy!)

But Team McCain tells me that their guy simply misspoke. He meant the dependent exemption, not a new tax credit. Well, so much for my last minute bid for Villa Leopolda in France, the legendary estate on the Côte d'Azur built by King Leopold.

Tags:
presidential election 2008,
John McCain,
taxes,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

He avoids talking about issues that AFFECT us everyday-jobs, then environment, gas for our cars, consumer prices, and how government affects us. It's always about countries most of us will never see or be really affected by. 9/11 was terrorists from Saudi Arabia and countries we don't want to take a stand with. This war has cost us. Look at his record of voting, do the homework before making a choice based on FEAR!

shannon of OR 2:11PM August 20, 2008

Good ol' typical liberal BS from the posters above. Especially from Deward Bowles, who is just making up stuff from thin air. Where are these phantom blackberry messages? And why is it that none of the major news outlets (including the one you're blogging on) does not have them.

This is getting downright disgusting. You guys can't stand to see your candidate get beat by someone who is not from an Ivy League school. And the more I read your guys' stuff, the more I realize that you guys don't just hate Bush, you hate anyone who doesn't believe in the things that you guys believe in. Which makes think that if Bush was never elected president and another Republican was elected instead, you guys would hate that president as well.

Chris of AZ 7:29PM August 19, 2008

John McCain didn't ALWAYS behave this way, did he? I used to be quite a fan of his. His record in Arizona shows that he fought for the rights of the people of his State rather than mindlessly follow the party line and he earned my respect. But now at every turn he seems to contradict the things that made him so hated by all the bought-and-paid-for Republicans around him. Now I can't stand to hear him talk because he just spews for the same mindless dribble. I also can't stand to see the robotic way he holds the microphone. George Bush 2.0 might, at times, sound like a nonsensical moron, but at least he doesn't look reanimated.

slapfire of TX 2:24PM August 19, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement