What Obamanomics Gets Right

August 26, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Jimmy P. at the DNC—The economy is tonight's theme here in Denver. (The formal title is "Renewing America's Promise.") So, in honor of that, I thought I would point out a positive in Barack Obama's economic agenda: Obama realizes that economic growth is good.

Now, that sounds like a joke, but it isn't. As a former aide to President Clinton told me yesterday, one of his boss's big accomplishments was to convince his party that growing the economic pie, not just redistributing wealth, was indispensable. (Now, this is a battle that Democratic centrists may have to refight given the growing hostility of many environmentalists to economic growth.)

So, I am encouraged that Obama has chosen economic growth over deficit reduction. Now don't get more wrong, gang,. I would love to see a balanced budget and a surplus, though it's the longer-term debt that's really dangerous. But if you want to deal with both the short-term and long-term debt problem, a fast-growing economy is a necessity. Got to get that right. As JFK put it: "In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low , and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now.... The purpose of cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy , which can bring a budget surplus."

That being said, I would love Obamanomics even more if Obama wanted to (1) dramatically cut discretionary spending, (2) dramatically cut the projected growth of entitlement spending, (3) lower harmful business and investment taxes like JFK. But to quote the man who jumped out of a burning plane with no parachute: "First things first!"

Tags:
Democratic National Convention,
economics,
2008 presidential election,
economy,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Who needs social security...I'll secure my own future. When will libs learn to quit relying on gov't for everything in life? Social Security was a mistake by a democrat/socialist president.

of GA 6:22PM August 28, 2008

Chris, maybe your Social Security Trust Fund is a boondoggle, that is, a thing you don't understand. Not so mine.

Who is Daniel David?

of 3:52PM August 27, 2008

"And, of course, James wants to cut "entitlement spending" first. Social Secutiry is owed $2,000,000,000,000.00 borrowed from its Trust Fund to pay for wars and income/estate tax cuts."

Daniel David, the trust fund, or lack thereof, was always a boondoggle. There never was a trust fund. The trust fund is called "the full faith and credit of the United States." If you want this trust fund to continue, you have to address long term issues elsewhere, such as taxes and spending.

"James expects it will never be paid back and expects you to be so stupid as to agree with him for the robbery from YOUR national pension plan."

Another boondoggle, for reasons already stated.

Chris of AZ 12:57PM August 26, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement