McCain's Tax Cut Problem

September 3, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

Jimmy P. at the RNC—If you're a Republican and you let a Democrat get to your right on taxes, you're probably going to have plenty of free time to ponder just how that happened. And to many economic conservatives, McCain is at risk of letting that happen. Now it's not so much that McCain doesn't have hefty tax cut package, it's just that Obama's seems more direct and family focused. While Obama emphasizes putting money into people pocket's right away, McCain focuses on growing the economy and creating jobs by keeping the Bush tax cuts and cutting corporate tax rates. (We currently have the second highest corporate tax rate on the planet.) Obama wants to create jobs primarily through his energy and infrastructure spending initiatives. Two different philosophies. But Fred Thompson showed in his speech last night that it is possible to sell the McCain approach to non-economists:

"We need a President who understands that you don't make citizens prosperous by making Washington richer, and you don't lift an economic downturn by imposing one of the largest tax increases in American history. Now our opponents tell you not to worry about their tax increases. They tell you they are not going to tax your family. No, they're just going to tax "businesses"! So unless you buy something from a "business", like groceries or clothes or gasoline...or unless you get a paycheck from a big or a small "business", don't worry...it's not going to affect you. They say they are not going to take any water out of your side of the bucket, just the "other" side of the bucket! That's their idea of tax reform."

Me: McCain may yet offer a new tax twist to his economic plan — we still have two months to go until Election Day — but the key will be to create a plan that wouldn't severely affect the budget over the near term.

Tags:
Republican National Convention,
2008 presidential election,
John McCain,
taxes,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

mcain and palin you are not poor so you do not know what it is like.Obama knows and can get us out of this

Jeri L Bogue of IA 7:01PM October 28, 2008

In our country there are 2 schools of thought. Conservative and Liberal (supposedly Republicans and Democrats).

Republicans want a small, hands off Government, and by very definition to CONSERVE the wealth of our nation. Problem is; we have very little wealth, borrowing from China to pay the Middle East. I argue that a “hands-off” government approach, to the tune of “conservation”, when millions are unemployed, is no place to start. Nothing plus nothing equals nothing! You can’t get out of a hole with out kicking some dirt in. It is also a subject for debate that de-regulation is the cause of the housing market being blind-sided.

We have bailed out the banks, but the individuals loose possibly their homes and certainly their credit. Anyone out there buying groceries on credit? Wanna bet? Proposed republican ideals of Privatization for schools, health care, and even social security puts ALL at risk.

During the great depression, the U.S. president F.D. Roosevelt. Put people to work under the Blue Eagle program. He built roads, bridges, and dams and put people to work. These workers paid income taxes from their paychecks, and got it back at the end of the year. In doing so, the fed had use of that money interest free for the whole year.

Unemployment is out of control, and we have to borrow money, both as individuals, and as a nation. Now a Republican Government wants to cut your taxes, good idea in times of wealth.

Create jobs and tax the masses, give it back at the end of the year. We have proven the “give a man a fish” theory twice this year, with BOTH economic stimulus plans. The other half of the analogy seems to be totally forgotten. How could a tax return, once a year, pay an individual’s weekly grocery bill, let alone the household monthly?

I resolve, “Cutting taxes is a mute point for the unemployed”.

Florida D of FL 5:13PM September 09, 2008

Re: 13:49:24 pm, above.

Econ 101 -- A "corporate tax rate" cannot be a percentage of the US Gross Domestic Product. Google on "corporate income tax rate." For corporations that make a lot of money, the income tax rate is about 35%. What percent of several trillion dollars is 35%? Non sequitur.

I think you meant to say that the amount of taxes paid by corporations is a small percentage of US Gdp. The reason that percentage is so low is because most corporations don't pay any taxes. ("What? Off with their heads! To the ramparts!") The reason they pay no income taxes is because they have no income. And that's because they spend all the money they make on things that will help them make more money in the future. What kinds of things? Well, salaries of employees, office equipment, maintenance, advertising -- in short, all of the things that keep the American economy sound and provide jobs.

Anyone, other than a socialist, got a problem with that?

Russ of MN 12:46PM September 05, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement