When President Obama Buys Wall Street

September 15, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Barack Obama has a lot of things he wants to do if elected president: quasi-nationalize healthcare, institute a cap-and-trade climate change plan, invest hundreds of billions in energy and infrastructure and education. What he does not want to do, I would imagine, is deal with an ongoing credit crisis on Wall Street. An adviser to the campaign told me that Obama has "contingency plans" to deal with the problem if it does not seem to be improving in 2009. (Already, he seems to be backing off his tax increases.)

Surely, one of those options may well be for the government to either take bad debt off the hands of the banks or take equity stakes in troubled financial institutions, or both. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summer has written recently that "consideration should be given to whether the government should establish a mechanism for purchasing assets from stressed banks in return for warrants or other consideration. " And commenting on what Summers wrote, economist and blogger Brad Setser writes: "After the U.S. election, I suspect the debate will shift toward the need for such a systemic solution. If this kind of intervention proves necessary, it would need to be accompanied by a rather wholesale change to the United States' system of financial regulation."

Don't think plenty of folks on Wall Street aren't thinking about such a scenario, even if Hank Paulson and President Bush want no part of it. This from Global Insight (bold is mine):

The downward pressure on asset prices that is likely to flow from the bankruptcy also puts other major financial institutions at risk—and we need not name names here. Suffice to say that further bankruptcies of major financial institutions would be a process that the economy cannot support at this particularly fragile juncture of the business cycle, and we would be looking at further severe deflationary pressure if indeed this does happen. Under this destabilizing scenario , Congress would come under incredible pressure to craft another fiscal stimulus plan, and on top of this , there is a strong likelihood it would have to step in and capitalize a major government financial entity that would purchase distressed financial system assets along the lines of the Resolution Trust Corporation— both outcomes of course at massive taxpayers' expense.

Of course, more government intervention would entail a hard look by investors at Uncle Sam's finances and whether it can afford more bailouts and more "investment" spending and $60 trillion in entitlement debt. Rather than the beginning of a return to big government, the banking crisis might be marking the end of it.

Tags:
banking,
government intervention,
presidential election 2008,
Barack Obama,
Wall Street

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It seems that most people are turning to Obama hoping for "change", but I must say I am a bit skeptical of this whole mess. After all, hasn't Obama received more campaign contributions from Wall St than anyone? Check the FEC and you might find impressive contributions from employees at Citigroup, JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Goldman, etc. What makes anyone think that, with all this cash rolling in from Wall St, Obama plans to enact any sort of plan to help out the taxpayers, such as increased regulation of the financial institutions? It has become quite clear that we are dealing with two corporate politicians. I just feel bad for all those Obama supporters that think they might get some real change.

curious about anyone's thoughts on this...

jon of OK 10:35AM September 25, 2008

It seems that most people are turning to Obama hoping for "change", but I must say I am a bit skeptical of this whole mess. After all, hasn't Obama received more campaign contributions from Wall St than anyone? Check the FEC and you might find impressive contributions from employees at Citigroup, JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Goldman, etc. What makes anyone think that, with all this cash rolling in from Wall St, Obama plans to enact any sort of plan to help out the taxpayers, such as increased regulation of the financial institutions? It has become quite clear that we are dealing with two corporate politicians. I just feel bad for all those Obama supporters that think they might get some real change.

curious about anyone's thoughts on this...

jon of 10:35AM September 25, 2008

perhaps a more logical way of looking at things would be to stop decline loans due to a credit score. There are several familys with the ability to purchase a home or an auto but due to past problems they are rejected yet they have the means to pay. Greed has consummed the banks and finance companys they over charge the less fortunate ie. higher interest rates and fees therefore making it difficult for them to repay. On the other hand the man with the good credit gets the best rates and most of the time no fees. Does that really make any sense? Maybe we should try to open up a little and see our econmy rise rather than keep waiting on mr perfect credit who is not going to spend anything now at all. Just a thought

eric of VA 10:24AM September 16, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement