Why McCain Goes Easy on Fannie and the CRA

October 3, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Here is the big question of the moment that many GOPers are asking: Why is John McCain not tearing into Barack Obama and the Dems on the huge role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Community Reinvestment Act in the financial crisis on Wall Street? In fact, the biggest criticism by conservatives of Sarah Palin's debate performance last night was that she had the opportunity to talk about Fannie/Freddie and the CRA but instead criticized the role of "predatory lenders."

Here is what Team McCain is telling me: Expect McCain to make the case on television, but don't look for him to turn to Obama in the next debate, point his finger, and say something like this (courtesy of the Ace of Spades HQ blog):

I stayed away from making these partisan attacks, even though you lied ridiculously about me and your own attempts at 'reform.' I held back, because partisan attacks—even truthful ones—would harm our country and reduce the chances of getting a vital bill passed. Well, the bill is now passed. I put country first. You didn't, and you lied on top of that. And now—only now that this crisis has been dealt with, to the extent we can—I'm going to give you a bit of straight-talk about Fannie, Freddie, my attempts to reform it, and your attempts to block reform on behalf of your big donors and friends in ACORN.

Nope, that is not going to happen Why not? 1) It is a complicated argument, and McCain is not good at making complicated arguments, not even about earmarks. (Note, additionally, his lack of defense of the war in Iraq during his debate with Obama. Amazing.)

2) There is a racial component to criticism of the Community Reinvestment Act that can make it sound like you are scapegoating minorities for Wall Street's problems.

3) The campaign believes McCain's time is better spent talking about taxes and energy and healthcare. Really.

There is a newish TV ad about Fannie and Freddie. You tell me if it makes the point conservatives desperately want McCain to make. I don't think it explicitly or aggressively connects the dots the way activists crave. Here is the transcript:

ANNCR: John McCain fought to rein in Fannie and Freddie.

The Post says: McCain "pushed for stronger regulation"..."while Mr. Obama was notably silent."

But, Democrats blocked the reforms.

Loans soared.

Then, the bubble burst.

And, taxpayers are on the hook for billions.

Bill Clinton knows who is responsible.

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: "I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

ANNCR: You're right, Mr. President. It didn't have to happen.

JOHN McCAIN: I'm John McCain and I approve this message.

My bottom line: The McCain campaign is underestimating how absolutely furious conservatives are that free markets, and by extension Reaganomics and the last 25 years of American economic policy, are getting the blame for the housing and credit crisis. A real morale killer, they tell me. Over and over. Every day.

Tags:
Freddie Mac,
John McCain,
Fannie Mae

Reader Comments Read all comments (188)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Rent a car companies http://all-car-rental.com/texas/Dallas/Enterprise%20Rent-A-Car/75209/

Car rental.

Jeaccusia of AL 9:47PM April 07, 2010

Mr. Pethokoukis:

No one suggests the obvious -- that McCain's PR guys are sabotaging his campaign!

How can you believe otherwise when on one of his latest national commercials which need to be hard hitting against Obama is him saying something like, "The last four years haven't been very good, but I intend to make the next four years much better.

How much worse could a single sentence possibly have been. Running aginst Bush after bragging he voted with him over 90% of the time is not a commercial for McCain, it's a commercial for Obama -- who jumped on it immediately.

No professional ad man is that stupid, this was sabotage.

Tony Schiavo

Anthony P. Schiavo of PA 9:56PM October 28, 2008

Some will do anything to get elected or keep office. Look at polls or public opinion then spin it the right way. Just a few examples.

"This is Bush's economy"

Really? When markets were booming, housing pricess soaring, I never heard that. Of couse not. Most 401k, pension plans (unions) benefitted from a booming markets,and that is a strong part of Dems voting base. We'll only take credit for allowing more of America to participate in the dream of owning a home no matter how bad the lending practices are or how qualified the borrower is. If it goes bad,we'll blame the GOP and get votes

"This is Bush's War"

Really? I didn't hear that after 9/11 when or even after we invaded Iraq. Only after the war began going bad.

"Nevermind that most of us Dems (Biden, Clinton, Pelosi etc.) voted for the war, we were mislead about WMDs".

Really? If we had found WMDs, nothing would have changed concerning the different middle east factions fighting for control. I think it had more to do with making sure you we are the right side of mass opinion. When everyone was waving flags you couldn't take the chance of loosing future votes if the war went well.

"Obama was against the war"

Really? He had no vote at the time (no skin in the game)so he didn't need to worry about future votes.

Obama "If I am elected, within the 1st month in office I will begin working on binging troops home"

Really? Does that statement mean anything? (Today I will begin a campaign to end injustice throughtout the world.I might not complete it for a 1000 years, but my statement cannot be refuted if I do anything at all.) But until then, and now that I am accountable for my stance, I will vote like almost everyone else for continuing to fund the war because I do need those voters who care about the safety and stength of our military, Isreal, and what Iran, Syria, etc. might do if we leave too early.

Obama "I'm not your typical politician. I will work for the poor and middle class to provide jobs and lower taxes, improve education, and make our country a country to be proud of again and repected througout the world"

Oh Really? Why didn't you start here in Chicago, IL. We have one of the highest tax rates in the country, our public school system ranks as on of the lowest in the country (although we have a yearly budget of 20M, $10,500 per student) and many of the politicians here are either being accused of crimes, getting their family members jobs despite qualifications, awarding contracts to friends, or awarding jobs for campaign work. Oh I forgot you needed them to get your career started.

Exactly, what did you do here?

I could go on but I have been out of work for a time and need to get back to my search. I should have been on McCain's canpaign, but i might be a little to truthful for that.

Also, although I don't agree with the choice you have made,I would like to apologize to any real prositutes who work for a living and actually provide a service

Lawrence Anthony of IL 1:33PM October 28, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement