The End of American Capitalism? Please

October 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print

I was just on MSNBC, and the anchor asked whether all this turmoil marks the end of American capitalism. Pretty sure it doesn't. As I wrote the other day:

More evidence of the truth of this analogy comes from the World Economic Forum—the Davos people—who for the second straight year judged the United States as possessing the most competitive economy in the world. (Then came Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, and Singapore.) Among America's strengths: innovation, flexible labor markets, and higher education. Not surprisingly, though, our institutions ranked a dismal 29th. (Thanks, Wall Street.)

The WEF also listed what our biggest problems are. Check out these top three, in descending order: tax rates, tax regulation, and inefficient government bureaucracy. That's right. The horrible handiwork of Uncle Sam is our big "problemo."...

And remember, the core U.S. economy is in far better shape than it was in the 1970s. Productivity, the key measure of an economy's strength, consistently grew at less than 2 percent in the 1970s and stayed weak until the tax cuts, deregulation, inflation fighting, and corporate restructuring of the 1980s blossomed into the tech and productivity boom on the 1990s and beyond. Productivity has averaged about 2½ percent since 1995 and is now running closer to 3 percent year over year, including 4.3 percent in the second quarter. So, yeah, the Main Street fundamentals are sound. It's Wall Street and Washington that are the problems.

Tags:
economics,
capitalism,
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Capitalism sucks big time in this country. The USA isn't any kind of MAVERICK country. Try living abroad and understanding the wonders of the real world out there.

Citicen of the World of NV 10:05PM October 20, 2008

It seems to.

History seems to be the stories of civilizations that rose and then declined.

If there is a common thread, it would be that each at the top of its influence and domination attempted to impose its values on the rest of the world.

This ultimately has always failed because humans are basically free spirits and resist herd like behavior.

All religious doctrines are very clear on this point.

People of no religious profession exhibit this behavior most of all.

But even after the great civilizations decline, their remnants remain and often contribute positive influence on humankind.

It cannot be predicted with certainty, but it appears that the most likely next great civilization to replace ours will be China.

Or maybe our experiment was just a chapter in the larger evolution as great civilizations evolve over hundreds and perhaps thousands of years.

And while they may crash suddenly, their remnants remain as part of the total mix and contribute something.

It may be that the dominance is less important to the history and the journey of humankind than the contribution.

Get back to me in a few thousand years on this and maybe we will have a clearer picture.

HillbillyBill of TN 6:19AM October 13, 2008

After all this mess is done, folks are not going to be looking to Wall St for leadership, they do not want to lead off a cliff again. So the Dollar might become irrelevant as the World moves to the Euro or some other currency with some integrity behind it.

Funny, the US has always had a mixed economy, capitalism with socialist institutions.

The current blend has failed - socialized losses and privatized profits. So we have to move on, and face the fact that Republicans who got us into this mess have pushed our country closer to Third World status, except for a few at the top of course.

Paul of WA 8:25PM October 11, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement