Wall Street to GOP: Drop Dead

October 14, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Might there be some huge political realignment going on? One sign of it is the growing disenchantment between Wall Street/Big Business and the GOP. From today's WSJ:

Sen. John McCain badly needs the cash infusion and momentum from a Tuesday night fund-raiser in New York. But the senator's recent demonizing of Wall Street made it tough to lure contributors, with Wall Street and corporate executives balancing their aggravation with the Republican presidential hopeful against their rising unease about his Democratic opponent. [On] Sept. 24, tensions heightened when Sen. McCain, who had come to New York for the United Nations session, met with key business supporters, including Cisco Systems' CEO John Chambers, retired E-Bay CEO Meg Whitman and private-equity guru Henry Kravis. The campaign invited these executives just the night before to show up at the Manhattan hotel for an emergency meeting. After the media left a photo op with the group, the financiers gave Sen. McCain an earful. Some of them warned him against getting personal and making Wall Street the scapegoat for the nation's troubles.

Me: So not only do you have the GOP nominee blasting Wall Street and losing the tax issue to his Democratic opponent, you have House Republicans as the key obstacle to the financial rescue plan. It's like what might have happened had Mike Huckabee gotten the nomination. The credit crisis, the $700 billion Paulson Plan, in particular—seems to have only accelerated a split that began with the go-go Clinton era, where you had a Democratic president who seemed pro-Wall Street both with his economic policies and cultural permissiveness. But can you be for the Investor Class and bash Wall Street at the same time? A hard push for lower cap gains rates and corporate tax, and a spirited defense of deregulation and free markets seem to be in the interest of both. But McCain has been doing little of that, many on the right say . And today's new economic plan is certainly a step in the wrong direction to many of those folks who see it as incrementalist.

Tags:
Wall Street Journal,
Wall Street,
John McCain,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Could you help me. Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

I am from Micronesia and also now'm speaking English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between alcohol treatment use and ipv.When choosing alcohol treatment centers, it is important that you familiarize drug treatment centers alcohol rehab dual diagnosis and addiction recovery."

Thanks for the help ;-), Hanne.

alcohol addiction treatment services of DE 5:42PM May 19, 2009

You site gives people fresh views. But we know all about cloths that need help getting stain out of.

I am from Lanka and now study English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Synthroid mcg extra low dosage pills x mcg free viagra pills."

Waiting for a reply ;-), Kerensa.

Kerensa of NM 2:58PM May 14, 2009

Wall Street was already backing the other side with over 70% of individual donations going their way before McCain came along according to the Huffington Post. The reason? The other side can be bought as Fannie and Freddie proved.

After all, it's less expensive to buy a senator than to buy market share. The cheapest way to corner the market is to corrupt a few congressmen. If you want to use a little Wall Street "walking around money" to tilt the playing field in your direction you approach the people who can be bought, who lack guilding principles beyond the puruit of power and prestige.

Remember, most Wall Street companies do not design, create, buy, build, hold, distribute, or sell anything but money. They're experts at moving money around. They can create derivatives, but can they create real value?

Ironically, this makes Wall Street a lot like Washington. The government doesn't design, create, buy, build, hold, distribute, or sell anything either. It merely moves money around too, albeit far less efficiently than Wall Street.

Yes, the provision of capital is important, but it is not the same as putting products on the street, gas in the tank, or bread on the table. Wall Street firms are like leeches on American enterprise that have grown overly large as they suck the blood out of companies and the economy. They are run by smart people who know everything about finance and little about the hard work of real business. They think short term, no longer than the next quarter, which results in short time horizons in corporate board rooms. It's not surprising they haven't puzzled through the likely long term impact of propping up left wing politicians financially.

The people I've met on Wall Street are very much like the liberals I've met in academia. They're bright. They're out of touch. They're naive about the way the real world works. They think they know more than anyone else.

Of course Wall Street supports the left.

A Main Street CEO of TX 9:20AM October 15, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement