Here Comes the Mother of All Housing Bailout Bills

October 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

All along, the Fed's big fear has been the emergence of what it calls an "adverse feedback loop": a housing implosion cripples the financial system, which undercuts the economy, which hurts housing, and so on, and so on. And more and more policymakers are convinced that to break that cycle, you have to stabilize the housing market. Until that happens, credit markets and therefore the economy will stay anemic. That is why you will likely see in 2009 an attempt to go beyond the Dodd-Frank housing bailout bill to more directly and expansively boost the housing market. As Capitol Hill maven Jaret Seiberg of the Stanford Group writes today: "The second housing stimulus would focus again on stabilizing housing markets by providing more assistance to those looking to purchase a home. Such support is intended to slow—if not reverse—the home price declines that are at the heart of the crisis."

So unlike some plans, like John McCain's $300 billion idea to give everyone a new mortgage, Washington may opt for some sort of package of tax credits to help buyers. Of course, what policymakers should be doing long term is taking steps to remove the tax preference for housing versus other sorts of investments.

Tags:
housing market,
bailout,
legislation

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

McCain's mortgage proposal is a joke, more 'Socialism for the Rich". This is McCain "Spreading the Wealth" to his banker buddies, while slapping the expense on taxpayers.

Paul of WA 7:15PM October 18, 2008

Bail is not available to anyone who has no assets to pledge.

The actual value of the dollar is no longer based on the trust in the government but in the new hallucination that those who took no risk should be provide the assets to the thieves and con artists who took the risks.

The amount of debt and the cost of future investment will take generations to repay.

None of this is necessary if banks are allowed to fail, houses are foreclosed, and the inflated costs of every commodity are allowed to reach a real value. A real value is whatever the commodity can sell for.

This can be accomplished by placing a small burden on stocks, finance, and insurance a small tax will keep these freeloaders under the eye of government and will make manipulation and evasion a criminal offense, beyond th reach of lobbyists and politicians.

Morton Kurzweil of FL 6:53PM October 17, 2008

It seems that the government has not learned its lesson when it comes to meddling in the private markets.

Didn't we get into this mess because the government was trying to "provide more assistance to those looking to purchase a home"? These people think that doing this will somehow stabilize the credit markets? I have a better idea: stop adding to excess housing inventory, create incentives (cash back, 0% financing for highly creditworthy individuals for a period of time), remove the tax favored treatment of housing, allow more foreign investment to flow into the country, reduce cap gains tax and income tax, and relax some rules that make the process to purchase a home more difficult. We have to work to get the excess glut of homes out of the market, not try to prop up people with more government assistance to purchase homes that they can't afford.

Chris of AZ 6:52PM October 17, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement