Nationalizing 401(k) Plans: Down Argentine Way

October 24, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

I posted yesterday about a loopy idea floating around Capitol Hill to shift people out of their 401(k) plans into a government plan. It would be like Social Security: the Sequel. It would also be a $100 billion-a-year tax increase that would hit people making as low as $75,000, according to the plan's author, a prof at the New School of Social Research. My guy Ed Morrissey over at Michelle Malkins's Hot Air site makes a great follow-up point:

I'd suggest that Pethokoukis vastly underestimates the effect this change will have on the stock market. The advent of private tax-deferred retirement accounts created a huge investor class in the U.S. By some estimations, more than 70% of American adults have money in the stock market in long-term investments for their eventual retirement. That's a revolutionary change in the relationship between labor and ownership, one that capitalism succeeded in creating where Marx and his followers only fantasized.

What happens when the tax deferral on this investment ends? Most people won't want to take the risks of the market without it, certainly not on the scale they do today (about $5 trillion in capital) and likely not after the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac collapse. They'll start moving to savings accounts or gold and removing their money from the markets. The flight of capital will eliminate the necessary engine for recovery, but that's a minor point. The price of stock will utterly collapse as everyone looks to liquidate their holdings, crashing Wall Street and throwing tens of millions out of work as publicly-held companies disintegrate.

Tags:
401(k),
stock market

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of

government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public

treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a

democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy,

always followed by a dictatorship.

If you are watching any of the current events with even a basic sense of history, economics, and the ability to analyze the legislation that is being passed by the congress, you are probably worried, and rightly so. If not, keep drinking the Obama, Pelosi, Reid Kool-Aid. One day you'll have to decide if you'll need a rifle to defend your home and what's left of our "freedom" -- There is new revolution brewing and the Illegals, Welfare cheats, corrupt politicians, power brokers, wall street jackals, and just plain lazy-assed maggots, liars and thieves are going to pay the price of their complete irresponsibility.

M. Williams of CA 12:28PM February 17, 2009

There is only one good thing that will come out of all this gov't corruption is that the o'nites will have to pay too. :-)

Joe Allen of GA 9:35AM November 22, 2008

If one could devalue publicly-held companies and then buy them up for pennies on the dollar...

Piltdown911 of WI 7:03PM November 12, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement