7 Ways for Obama to Save the Housing Market

November 14, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (32)

The Great Housing Bailout of 2009 is coming. The recent announcement by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Citigroup that they plan to reduce mortgage payments for hundreds of thousands of borrowers facing foreclosures may well be just the beginning of help for homeowners. More and more economists now agree that falling prices and rising foreclosures are at the heart of the economic and credit crises—neither of which will end until housing stabilizes. If the new Obama administration is looking for ideas on what to do, here are some possibilities:

1) The Bair Plan. Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., wants the government to help as many as 3 million struggling homeowners by having Uncle Sam use some of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money to guarantee mortgages backed by private lenders. That could encourage them to restructure loans to troubled homeowners. Since the FDIC took over mortgage lender IndyMac this summer, it has modified loans held by IndyMac that were 60 days or more past due. This was the policy inspiration for the Fannie-Freddie-Citigroup plan.

2) The Blinder Plan. Alan Blinder, a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton and a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, wants to kick it old school. He supports the creation of a 21st-century version of the New Deal-era Home Owners' Loan Corp. The HOLC basically bought mortgages from banks and then issued more affordable new loans to struggling homeowners. This plan might cost $400 billion, or about half the cost of the Paulson plan to bail out Wall Street, although in the end the HOLC made a small profit on its investment. Blinder would limit the plan to owner-occupied homes and to honestly obtained mortgages. And owners of homes the size of Wayne Manor need not apply.

3) The Hubbard Plan. R. Glenn Hubbard, dean of the Columbia Business School, says it's time to go big or go home. Help everyone. He suggests that the White House and Congress allow all mortgages on primary residences to be refinanced into 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages at 5.25 percent, the lowest mortgage rate in the past 30 years. Those mortgages would then be placed with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As for underwater mortgages, Hubbard, like Alan Blinder, would refinance them into 30-year, fixed-rate loans to be held by a HOLC-like agency. Hubbard thinks this could cost about $300 billion, but the subsequent economic rebound might essential pay for the whole thing.

4) The Lindsey Plan. Lawrence Lindsey, former director of the National Economic Council under President George W. Bush, says one way to boost housing demand is by creating more potential buyers. He advocates an immigration program that would give a provisional green card to anyone who invested at least $10 million in residential property and held it for five years. Each property could be worth no more than $1 million. Another option would be for the Fed to let inflation rise to encourage investment in housing, traditionally a financial safe haven from rising prices. Or, again, the government could start buying large amounts of distressed or foreclosed homes.

5) The Meltzer Plan. Allan Meltzer, professor of political economy at Carnegie Mellon University, says it's all about supply and demand. He thinks Washington should focus on helping existing homeowners by increasing the demand for housing. That would boost prices and reduce the number of defaults. Potential buyers would be allowed to use some percentage of the value of their down payment as a tax deduction. Another option would be to reduce the tax rate for buyers, even if they are buying a second or third home.

6) The Yardeni-Goldsmith Plan. Investment strategist Ed Yardeni and Carl Goldsmith of Delta Asset Management propose nationalizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Once that is done, the two entities could borrow at the same low rates as the U.S. Treasury. Then, Fannie and Freddie could offer 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages at 4 percent to all qualified borrowers to buy a new or existing home.

7) The Zingales Plan. Luigi Zingales, a business professor at the University of Chicago, says that Congress should pass a law making it super easy to renegotiate your mortgage if you live in an area where prices have plunged. Here is how it would work: First, you would have to live in a ZIP code where house prices dropped by more than 20 percent, as measured by the Case-Shiller index, since the time you bought your property. The homeowner could then have the face value of the mortgage (and thus his or her interest payments) reduced by the same percentage that house prices have declined since the homeowner bought the property. In exchange, however, the mortgage holder would get some of the equity value of the house when it eventually is sold.

Tags:
housing market,
housing,
government intervention,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (32)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hi, I have a simple idea. What if the government, passed tax cuts aimed at the home

rental industry? Say a accelerated depreciation schedule, and a ten year amnesty on

recaptured capital gains. Give landlords the same tax breaks as homesteaded, owner occupied homes. First $250,000 in profits tax free. I believe for the private home market to recover, we will have to move many

people from home ownership to the rental market. So we must make it a winning bet for a

investor to speculate, that when he buys a home to rent, that he will have at least a break

even cash flow, and favorable tax treatment when he sells. benefits : entrepreneurship, many new opportunities for every day middle class

people to become landlords.

Little cost to the government : It will take a long time for home values to rise

above the $250,000.00 in profits, which is exempt for tax on homesteaded, owner

occupied homes. So that tax money will not be collected anyway.

Easy to implement. As easy to do as any tax cut.

It' fair, will not take money from one tax payer, to give it to another.

Raise values of all homes. As inventory is removed from market, prices will

stabilize.

Good for banks, As home values stabilize so will defaults on mortgages, which

will also help to keep new "low priced " inventory off the

market

Good for local governments, as home values increase so will tax payments to

government.

Good for new jobs, and its good for the kind of jobs hit hardest by downturn.

Land lords will put to work, painters, carpenters, etc.

Targeted tax break, can be applied only to single family home

rentals.

catfishjoe of FL 3:15PM June 23, 2011

Many people did live Way above their means and many did push these arms BUT I think...one would have to be naive to think they,re the majority. I think everyone ,if we got right down to it would be amazed at how many homeowners there are out there that NEVER lived above their means...had conventional mortgages but either lost their jobs, had their salaries cut and just could no longer keep up with all the rising costs as they watched their homes go under water. Everyone knows, real estate markets fluctuate and most of us do know there could come a time when we lose SOME value in our homes ,BUT when you go under or MOST are going under by $60,000-$125,000, thats a little bit different...just a little out of the norm.

Karen M. of CT 1:37PM November 23, 2009

My husband and I USED to have good credit ,But the housing market and unscrupulous lenders have destoyed us!We have been hanging by a thread for the past 6 months...and thats exactly how long we,ve been working with our lenders. In that time one of our lenders gave us a very minute modification, almost laughable But we took it for whatever. Our second lender BOA told us they would work with us, but paperwork was lost, misplaced, faxes not faxed (they claimed ) and they,ve had us running around for months just to find out last week "their investors won,t agree to a modification " These modifications were a total joke...and these banks for the most part are just stringing people on never intending to give anyone any real help! We need to bring our home values down to or near where the market says they are at...that is the ONLY way we have a level playing field with which to fight back with! If our homes are worth what they,re saying they,re worth and our homes are adjusted accordingly...that in itself would end up putting money back in our pockets and ultimately back into the ailing economy , I really feel until this happens...more and more people are going to lose their homes, bringing other homes values down even more and ultimately end up destroying even more lives! Even if you inundate the housing market with more buyers by giving them tax incentives...these people are buying the foreclosures, the homes that will bring the homes of those struggling to stay afloat, down in value even MORE!!! I,m glad for the first time homeowner who can finally buy a home...BUT at what cost? Does anyone out there think of the families that have lost those homes or the families that will be effected in the future by these people purchasing all these foreclosures? I can only see more and more foreclosures in the near future if we don,t get this right. WE NEED A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD and WE NEEDED IT MONTHS AGO!!!

Karen M. of CT 5:06PM November 22, 2009

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement