Bad Economy Could Cause China Crackup

December 1, 2008 RSS Feed Print

I have written a series of blog posts warning about the geopolitical and economic fallout of a sharp slowdown in China's economy. Simply put: Slower growth could lead to dangerous political instability. The sole source of the authoritarian government's legitimacy has been its ability to deliver an even-rising standard of living for more than a generation. Don't believe me? Here is what President Jintao Hu said over the weekend at a party meeting:

“In this coming period, we will starkly confront the effects of the sustained deepening of the international financial crisis and pressure as global economic growth clearly slows. ... Whether we can turn this pressure into momentum, turn challenges into opportunities, and maintain steady and relatively fast economic development is a test of our Party's capacity to govern.”

This is why China has been hesitant to allow any dramatic appreciation by the yuan vs. the dollar. To the extent that a stronger currency slows the economy, the ruling Communist Party views a rapid yuan appreciation as an existential threat. This what journalist Will Hutton, author of The Writing on the Wall: Why We Must Embrace China as a Partner or Face It as an Enemy, told me early last year:

"Unrest is growing even under current conditions. Such a rapid appreciation of the yuan over a short period could be a tipping point for a wave of unrest, which could threaten the regime's stability. The party leadership sees the demand for fast yuan appreciation as an act of economic warfare. In these terms, you can see why. ... The World Bank estimates that if China's growth rate fell by just 2 percent, up to 60 percent of China's bank loans would become nonperforming–so threatening both China's and, via Hong Kong, Asia's financial system. The flow of saving to finance the U.S.'s deficit would dry up, probably forcing U.S. interest rates up–so worsening the economic slowdown. ... There is the risk of a credit crunch forced by the banking system being overwhelmed by nonperforming loans. ... The risk of political instability is low, but it exists."

Me: Let's remember that China a) has been -- along with America -- one of the primary engines of global economic growth as well as buy of U.S. bonds, and b) has nuclear weapons. While no freedom-loving member of Western Civilization has any love for the current despotic regime, neither do we want to see political and economic chaos in China. Fun China Fact: Back in the 1990s, Pentagon analysts thought a bad economy could result in the fall of the Communists from power and the political dissolution of the country into maybe a dozen smaller nations. Hey, have fun, Hillary!

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You wrote...

"Yeah, right... I guess you really don't know chinese history. For thousands of years it was many separated provinces, constantly in war with each other. Even now 1/3 of China (uighurs, tibetans)would be happy to separate, and HK too, and Guandong (Canton) too, and many other provinces, even Shanghai."...

The "constant war" that you are refering to is call the "Warring States" period, which, in 221 BC, ended with the unification of China under the Qin. How do you know that "1/3" of China want to separate? CNN and BBC told you? HK too? Did you see how many came out in HK waving the Chinese flag during the Olympics Torch Relay? I am sure you didnt because BBC didn't bother showing it. By the way, Shanghai IS NOT a "province"....It's a city.

Michael Lou of MA 6:06AM December 03, 2008

China could disintegrate just as the Soviet Union did. But then, so could the USA! Without lending from China the USA would be insolvent and could break up into several semi-autonomous regions (e.g. California) with a very weak central government in Wash. D.C.

Frank B. of OR 8:49PM December 02, 2008

I am sure China's breakup is exactly what you wish for....The fact that you indicated that Xinjiang and Xizhang are "recent" acquisitions really does show where you stand as far as your knowledge, and opinion of China are. While China has a myriad of local and regional interests, how is that strange for a country that is the third largest in the world? How is this particular trait unique to China? The traditional preference for sons do have a warping effect on the demographic balance...but this can be solved with immigration..China has always been a land empire absorbing new people. As for young men who become criminals...do you know the per capita jail immate numbers are for China? How about the absolute number of Chinese immates? You should go look this up. You will be surprised.

Like I said before, China needs to seriously re-orient its economy toward domestic consumption, and break its link to the pirchasing of US treasury bonds. The American lifestyle is unsustainable; instead of predicting the demise of a relatively poor and still developing China, maybe people should try to fix what's wrong with the world' sole superpower?

Michael Lou of MA 6:33PM December 02, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement