Global Economy: Broken by Fear

December 3, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Consultant and all-around smart guy David Smick, author of The World is Curved, makes some good points here:

1) The great myth of 2008 has been that the financial meltdown has stemmed solely from a U.S.-initiated subprime mortgage market collapse and the resulting global fallout.  If that were the case, the problem would represent defaults and/or write-downs on a fraction of a $1.5 trillion problem.  This would hardly be a cheerful development, but nonetheless would represent a situation manageable by global financial markets.

 
2) A number of analysts talk about eight bubbles ranging from the subprime mortgage loans (again, $1.5 trillion) to emerging market debt ($5 trillion) to outstanding credit card debt ($2.5 trillion) to commodities derivatives ($9 trillion) to commercial real estate ($25 trillion) to foreign exchange derivatives ($56 trillion) to credit default swaps ($58 trillion) and so on.

 3) Global financial markets see that the eight bubbles represent roughly $200 trillion of worst-case global financial exposure.  Factor in a conservative 10 percent drop in the value, or 10 percent default rate, on this exposure and the world would face a $20 trillion challenge. Here's the catch (and why the markets remain so nervous).  The GDP of the entire world is only $50 trillion.  World stock and bond markets are now valued at less than $100 trillion.

 4) Translation: Psychologically speaking, central bank monetary stimulus and government fiscal intervention efforts (in the hundreds of billions of dollars) are no match for the market'sfear of a worst-case scenario involving tens of trillions of dollars. The numbers are simply mind boggling.

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Here are a couple of points that may lessen the fear a bit. We should not forget double entry accounting. If one group has to pay off a derivative contract, then it loses, but the other party gains. Net global loss -- zero.

And, the really big numbers used in this post are the notional value of derivatives contracts such as credit default swaps. Notional value is the value of the underlying asset covered by the derivative contract. As such, numbers like $56 trillion generally do not reflect anything close to the real values likely to be lost.

www.fundmasteryblog.com

Kurt Brouwer of CA 6:17PM December 03, 2008

Financial people like Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and economists talk much about a crisis of confidence today. That's because they're confidence men.

Money talks and BS walks. Seems to me it's more a matter of a real lack of money than a lack of confidence. After decades of shedding wealth to China and using more and more credit to buy consumer goods, folks used up their money and are overextended on credit. Same thing with the government, wasting money on Bush's crusades and sundry other wasteful things while adhering to the fantastic notions of eclownomists like Laffer that you don't really have to pay taxes. What a seductive idea. Less tax, more revenue. In the real world of human nature, it seems an inevitable corollary to "you don't have to pay taxes" is that "you don't have to limit spending." Growth will pay for one as well as the other.

Luther of IL 11:27AM December 03, 2008

By the way, what ever happened to CPA opinions on financial statements that were supposed to "fairly represent" the financial status of any entity? Was the whole CPA game a sham? Ignoring the real risks on the balance sheets while tying the petty cash fund out to the penny?

of 10:25AM December 03, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement