The Stimulus Spending Alternative: 4 Tax Cut Options

December 8, 2008 RSS Feed Print

More of this, less of that. Economists Brian Wesbury and Bob Stein make the case for something besides a mega-stimulus spending plan:

1) Why not eliminate corporate taxes all together? During FY2008, the US Treasury collected $304 billion in corporate taxes – elimination would cost roughly half of what the Obama stimulus plan may cost and just 30% of this year’s budget deficit. Imagine how the elimination of corporate taxes would change investor perceptions about investment, even for auto companies. 

2) Another option would be full (100%) expensing for any investment made by any company in 2009. This would encourage spending and investment. Individual income tax receipts were $1.15 trillion in FY2008. 

3) A 50% reduction in tax rates would cost less than the Treasury’s TARP proposal. Lower tax rates would take the sting out of any pay cuts unionized workers at auto companies might be forced to accept. 

4) Another option would be to allow all capital losses by individuals to be written off in full for 2008, rather than limiting them to just $3,000. This would limit the selling of profitable investments this year to absorb those losses for tax purposes only.

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sharon

http//www.autoloans101.info

Sharon of AR 10:30PM January 02, 2009

why not give the 750 billion back to the tax payers who could pay off credit cards and loans. the banks then would have more money to loan out. the 750 would help taxpayers and the banks.

I know this is just a dream but Washington needs to think outside the box and try and help the taxpayers. I guess they would just rather bite the hand that feeds them.

Bill Hankins of VA 8:52PM December 13, 2008

Tom Hanna,

Interesting idea, yours. I wonder, however, about unintended consequences. For example, would your plan encourage investors to sell assets and then re-invest the proceeds under the tax-free unbrella? What sort of distortions would that create, if any?

I continue to be amazed (I shouldn't be) by the creativity shown by the free-market oriented folks as they seek at solutions for our economic ills, as compared to the simpleminded offerings from the government activists.

The difference, i think boils down to this: one side is dealing in economics, while the other is not, preferring instead to offer ideas that satisfy political desires.

Dean of MN 1:24PM December 09, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement