Goldman Sachs: A Housing Fix

December 9, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Here's what the Smart Money Crowd thinks about housing:

-- The case for more aggressive and comprehensive intervention in the housing sector seems compelling.  Supply and demand remain significantly out of whack, with vacancies at record levels and foreclosures surging.  Home prices continue to decline with significant damage to the broader economy.  To date, government and private-sector homeowner assistance efforts do not appear to have made meaningful inroads into the problem. Any intervention should consider the impact on incentives for delinquent borrowers, borrowers who are current in their payments, and renters, and it should focus on reducing the overall number of foreclosures.

-- A bewildering array of proposals has been mooted by policymakers, private sector analysts, housing market participants, and others.  These proposals generally involve one or more of three elements:  1) reduction in borrowers’ monthly payments, 2) forgiveness of principal or other measures to move borrowers into a positive equity position, and 3) actions to spur demand for housing.  

--Although media and policymaker attention has focused on the first approach, this is unlikely to be sufficient.  Bringing mortgage rates down further is likely to be part of the solution, although the unfortunate truth is that no panacea exists.

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

My understanding is that, in Europe, mortgage holders who default can have ALL of their assets tapped to repay the principle of the loan. In the United States, those assets (401k, IRAs, etc.) are shielded from seizure.

How about this: those homeowners currently in a negative equity position, but able to make their mortgage payments, should just stay put and suck it up.

Homeowners who can otherwise make their payments but declare bankruptcy simply because they are "under water" are, IMO, a major problem (to be kind). Aside from a temporarily damaged credit score, what cost do they bear for their financial malfeasance? If they put zero down and have paid little principle, they're out almost nothing. Perhaps if their wider asset base were at risk, as is the case in Europe, they might not treat their obligation so cavalierly.

Nothing will be done to stop this activity, unfortunately.

Cut Taxes, Cut Spending, Restart The Economy

Dean of MN 11:53AM December 10, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement