Bush's $17.4 billion Automaker Bailout? Not Good.

December 19, 2008 RSS Feed Print

OK, so the White House has apparently come to the momentary rescue of the U.S. auto industry by offering $17.4 billion in loans in exchange for concessions similar to what was in the House bill. So no sweeping wage or benefit or work rule cuts. That will be left to the Obama car czar who'll likely be far easier than a bankruptcy judge. Bailout Nation continues.  A few details from the AP:

One official said $13.4 billion of the money would be available this month and next, $9.4 billion for General Motors Corp. and $4 billion for Chrysler LLC. Both companies have said they soon might be unable to pay their bills without federal help. Ford Motor Co. has said it does not need immediate help.

Bush said the rescue package demanded concessions similar to those outlined in a bailout plan that was approved by the House but rejected by the Senate a week ago. It would give the automakers three months to come up with restructuring plans to become viable companies.

If they fail to produce a plan by March 31, the automakers will be required to repay the loans, which they would find very difficult.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I add my questions on US bailout plan for auto makers

1. if US govt gives bailout money to automobile industries, does it increase consumer's purchase power to purchase a car?

2. if US govt gives bailout money to automobile industries, do the banks give loans as rapid as they were giving previously to buy a car?

3. if the cosumer doesnt buy a car and banks dont offer loans then how will these automobile industries going to earn and pay back the bailout money to govt?

4. if automobile industries dont earn then how long these companies use this bailout money to survivie?

5. at the end this tex payers's money is going to be fired in the furnace of fix expenses of these companies if they run the same strength of employees and over heads. And if they decrease the strength of employees to decrease their over heads then why they are demanding for a bailout?

6. is govt playing with the money of tax payers in the form of bailout?

7. Govt should give relaxation in immigration rules so that many more people may come to US, thus the demand of land and houses may increase and re-gain their lost value. why govt is not paying attention to the area from where the problem has arisen?

8. Most importan question: how will these company return this money? have they shown concrete steps to achieve the target? or their future steps to return the loan are on expectations and hopes on US economy which is toppling rapidly day by day.

Ch Usman Ihsan 2:21AM January 15, 2009

I realize all the nicey, nicey words being said publicly but I'd love to see Obama whip Georgie's ass on the White House lawn!!! All America would cheer...

Ray Fisher of NM 11:08AM December 20, 2008

Look in your garage or driveway. If at least one of the vehicles sitting there does not have a nameplate made by the three American car companies then you are part of the problem. Do not give me any of the rhetoric put out by conSucker reports. The cars built now no matter which nameplate are good dependable vehicles. It is now a ill conceived status symbol to drive foreign nameplated cars.

James of NC 9:46AM December 20, 2008

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement