What Liberals Want Obamanomics to Be

December 29, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

The economic wishes and dreams of Jeff Madrick in The Nation:

1) Raise the minimum wage still higher and on a regular basis. It has fallen far behind increases in inflation since the 1970s, and that affects higher level wages as well.

2) Encourage living-wage programs by local governments. Governments can demand that their contractors and suppliers pay well above the minimum wage. There is substantial evidence that this does not result in an undue loss of jobs.

3) Enforce the labor laws vigilantly. Minimum-wage and maximum-hour laws are violated to a stunning degree. American workers shouldn't be forced by their employers to understate the number of hours worked or be locked in the warehouse so they can't leave on time. Workers often make only $2 and $3 an hour.

4) Unions are not seeking a free pass to organize secretly when they advocate for open check-offs on cards to approve of a union vote. They are seeking to organize without persistent and often illegal management interference. Penalties for illegally deterring such organizing are so light, it makes little sense for management not to pursue strategies to stop organizing even at the cost of prosecution.

5) Request that trading partners develop serious environmental standards and worker-protection laws. This is good for them, bringing a progressive revolution and a robust domestic market to their countries. It is good for America, which will be able to compete on a more level playing field.

6) Demand that the president, governors and mayors speak up about unconscionable executive salaries and low wages. The influence from the top cannot be underestimated. A president who looks the other way sends a strong signal to business. A president who demands responsible treatment of workers will get a response. Business does not like such attention.

7) These measures should be accompanied by serious investment in modernized infrastructure and energy alternatives, which can create millions of domestic jobs that pay good salaries. It should also be accompanied by a policy that supports a lower dollar--contrary to Rubinomics--in order to stimulate manufacturing exports again. Accomplishing this may require a new system of semi-fixed currencies across the globe. The unabashed high-dollar policy of the past twenty years has led to imbalances around the world that have contributed fundamentally to US overindebtedness.

8) And finally, the nation needs more balance on the part of the Federal Reserve between subduing inflation and creating jobs. Americans can live with inflation above 2 percent a year. There is no academic evidence to support a 2 percent annual target, although the Fed has made this its informal target.

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I had been all for McCain going way back and generally vote Republican. I agree with Concerned Reader though. I know of some and even know a couple "liberals" that fit Mr. Madrick's characterizations, but know a lot more Obama voters who don't!! That is great news as just about everything on the list embraces ideology and excess -- ironically in an interestingly similar way in which Bush embraced the Neocon's theories that didn't exactly work in reality or on the idea that financial markets could self-regulate perfectly when parties to financial transactions and financial experts don't fully understand the financial innovations that have occurred in the derivatives markets! I was concerned about Obama's past associations and the highly ideological parts of the Democrats' campaign this year that promoted an agenda that would take us back to 1979, but many of the moderate republicans & democrats and independents voting for him wanted a realistic data-driven approach to governing.

The so-called Bush Doctrine on pre-emptive use of military force ought to be refined to fit reality [an ongoing process since Rummy's departure] and smarter and better regulations need to be put in place in the financial markets -- that does not necessarily mean "re-regulation" to the excesses of the 1970s. The "Reagan Revolution" has done a lot of good for America economically, but some updating of regulations is a must as is actually enforcing regulations - Greenspan, Chris Cox, and others showed a lot of incompetance and negligence in this task.

The bottom line is that, at least the Obama voters I know, a clear majority wanted a "change" in attitude from the Karl Rove negativity, a celebration of America's diversity, and realistic middle-of-the-road policies not Socialism. I'm mostly happy with Obama's efforts so far, but the real test will come later next month!

Joe C. of VA 9:13PM December 29, 2008

Cher concerned reader,

As the Nation goes so go the Obamanauts,

As the old Zen master said: "We'll see."

vanderleun of WA 8:57PM December 29, 2008

Would you get serious. You could poll Obama voters and 80% would not have even heard of the above much less say they voted for him because of the above. Did Obama focus on any of those points? He may have alluded to some in passing but to suggest the above is representative of "obamanomics" is pure econ porn for the right wing nuts.

Are you meant to be a serious purveyor of views or a econ porn dealer?

concerned reader of Pethmeth of IL 5:46PM December 29, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement