Kudlow: America Needs a Choice, Not an Echo

December 31, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Larry Kudlow says what  urgently needs to be said to Bailout America as he only he can say it. Here are some excerpts but please  read the whole thing:

We don’t need bailout nation. Nor do we need the government picking winners and losers in a massive, Keynesian, new-New Deal spending extravaganza. And it’s not Obama’s middle-class tax cut that’s going to get us out of this economic jam. At best his vision is incomplete. But at worst his aversion to successful earners and investors is a real obstacle to full economic recovery.

Social historian and early supply-side activist Irving Kristol taught us three decades ago that the top earners are the economic activists. They’re the ones with the highest propensity to consume and invest. They’re the ones who buy the yachts, which are built by blue-collar workers. And they’re the ones who run the small businesses and provide the capital for the new entrepreneurial start-ups that are the lifeblood of the economy. It is they who energize free-market capitalism.

If we had an economy without rich people we wouldn’t have much of an economy. That’s why lower tax rates to reward the economic activists — the most prominent capitalists — are so essential.

In fact, the GOP has a great opportunity to challenge Obama’s Keynesian pump-priming by insisting there be a major tax-cut component in any new fiscal package. Republicans shouldn’t merely push for somewhat less government spending. They have to make a bold case that tax rates matter for economic growth and job creation. They must insistthat any recovery package includes this key element. Shift the debate. Say clearly that a reenergized economy cannot occur without lower marginal tax rates.

In particular, the GOP position should include lower tax rates on large and small businesses. Right now the top federal tax rate for C-corps is 35 percent. Small businesses, which pay the individual rate, also are taxed at 35 percent. These rates should be 20 percent for both C-corps and S-corps (including LLCs). This would make a huge difference. It would be a boon for our global competitiveness, since companies in the U.S. (as well as Japan) are taxed way above the rates of other advanced countries. It also would attract job-creating investment flows to the U.S. at a time when capital is on strike in our financial markets and economy. And while businesses collect corporate taxes, it’s really consumers who pay the final cost.

Republicans also could promote a middle-class tax cut that would reduce the 28 percent and 25 percent brackets down to 15 percent. And of course, the GOP should work hard to maintain the Bush tax cuts on capital gains, dividends, inheritance, and top individual rates.

In fact, lower capital-gains tax rates will raise revenues, since this is the single most sensitive tax on the Laffer curve. Indeed, many economists — including Alan Reynolds at the Cato Institute — argue that the growth and simplification effects of reducing the corporate tax rate would be revenue positive.

The whole debate in Washington is heavily skewed toward government spending on infrastructure. It’s all spending and virtually no tax cuts. For a more balanced and effective recovery policy, the GOP has to bolster its argument for spending discipline with a loud case for tax cuts.

It truly is time for a choice, not an echo.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I seem to recall how Larry Kudlow thought the bailout (you know, the first one, the one that Hank assured us was big enough to take care of all our problems) was a fine idea.

So while he is correct that taxation and make-work projects are not going to fix anything, his credibility is a little atrophied these days.

Slipstream of MO 7:53AM January 01, 2009

If the rich drive the economy, the economy shouldn't be in the tank? I would guess that the rich are still rich. Based on the present state of the economy it would appear that your hypothesis is incorrect.

On the other hand, if the poor people had an easier time obtaining money you can rest assured that they will be spending it just to survive. The money would be trickling up to the rich people. I have no doubt that banks would be falling over themselves to make loans to the poorer people who have some money.

The economy is slowing lets give the people with the money some more money to fix the problem.Give me a break. Sounds about as intelligent as global warming.

RH of 8:13PM December 31, 2008

While I agree with the idea that the rich buy most of the big ticket items, getting more funds downstream is also important. I have been in the restaurant industry for 35 years, and our business is very susecptable to economic variations. Your point is well taken that the rich spend money in our businesses, but when you talk about driving the economy, I think, on a percentage basis, the lower classes waste th most money on stupid consumer goods that the rich people's companies are selling. Even the busboys are carrying I-Phones. Middle class? hell-no! I'm to busy paying my mortgage, I really havent bought any new stuff in years... But my bartender just bought a new plasma...So, all I'm pointing out is that the money goes both uphill and down. The middle class is to scared to spend anything right now, so the top and bottom are our only hope. Unless of course the media stops talking about the recession, Because then, in about 2 weeks the short attention spans we have cultivated will have forgotten all about it and the hordes will return to the malls wearing those stupid brightly colored plastic shoes, wasting tons of money on all the junk that our economy is built on.....Hey Pal! What some sneakers with lights in them?

Al Pfeuffer of NJ 11:07AM December 31, 2008

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement