How Bad Will the U.S. Economy Get?

January 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print

If Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart are correct (they looked at 18 postwar banking crises), much worse:

Broadly speaking, financial crises are protracted affairs. More often than not, the aftermath of severe financial crises share three characteristics. First, asset market collapses are deep and prolonged. Real housing price declines average 35 percent stretched out over six years, while equity price collapses average 55 percent over a downturn of about three and a half years.

Second, the aftermath of banking crises is associated with profound declines in output and employment. The unemployment rate rises an average of 7 percentage points over the down phase of the cycle, which lasts on average over four years. Output falls (from peak to trough) an average of over 9 percent, although the duration of the downturn, averaging roughly two years, is considerably shorter than for unemployment.

Third, the real value of government debt tends to explode, rising an average of 86 percent in the major post–World War II episodes. Interestingly, the main cause of debt explosions is not the widely cited costs of bailing out and recapitalizing the banking system. Admittedly, bailout costs are difficult to measure, and there is considerable divergence among estimates from competing studies.

But even upper-bound estimates pale next to actual measured rises in public debt. In fact, the big drivers of debt increases are the inevitable collapse in tax revenues that governments suffer in the wake of deep and prolonged output contractions, as well as often ambitious countercyclical fiscal policies aimed at mitigating the downturn.

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ALL I CAN SAY IS DONT HAVE KIDS IF YOU CANT AFFORD THEM FINANCIALLY OR EMTIONALLY

STEVE of CA 4:52AM January 30, 2010

I think we need to get to the heart of the issue.

First, the business interest or business class that exist in America is holding the nation hostage. This idea that business leaders will move their operations overseas or completely close down shop if we raise taxes on rich is absurb, anti-American and even anti-democratic. A sound nation built on democratic principles cannot come to fruition if this mentality persist that we are all self-interested individuals with a god-given right to aquire as much as wealth as possible without the slightest concern for the community, society or the biosphere. The so called business leaders of America and other affluent parts of the globe need to step up remember that with wealth and profit comes a duty to ensure the well-being of the community. Sure, there will always be some free-riders in the system, but most people on this planet are hard working and only desire to live in a society that that is stable, sociable and harmonious.

The idea that we cannot have health care, well-funded schools or social welfare programs in this countries is conducive with a mean-spirited, facist, materialistic ideology that is in complete opposistion with democracy or the teachings of Jesus.

On the other hand, the working people of America to wake up as well and understand the crux of the situation and possibilities to reconstruct a democratic society. To do so, requires that people put down the remote control or the 600 calorie drink they just bought at Starbucks and realize that solid unions, universial healthcare, public transporation and eithics are not socialist concepts, but those things necessary for a healthy democratic society in the modern world.

jimmy 3:38AM June 20, 2009

I think we should start by taking 60% of your pay Could be, but then again, you probably don't pay taxes. I bet you do get the EIC though, which is a total bull crap government entitlement program. Not only do you probably get the EIC, you probably are one of those people that piss me off at the 7/11 buying cokes and cookies with your food stamp card. History has shown that lowering taxes not only increases jobs in this country but also increases (thats right), increases tax revenues for the government. That in turn gives them more, not less, money in order to continue feeding food stamp/welfare recipients like yourself so that you can continue to breed like rabbits (probably out of wedlock) in order to create a whole new generation of mindless, lazy, good for nothing cattle who can live off of mine and eventually my childrens hard work. In my opinion, people such as yourself should be allowed to starve to death which in turn would let Darwins theory work again, survival of the fittest. But, then again, the fittest are much harder to control.

C. Daugherty of OK 2:50PM February 10, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement