Barack Obama and Supply-Side Economics

January 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Some Congressional Democrats are sniping that Barack Obama's stimulus package is too heavy on tax cuts vs. infrastructure spending. Now many conservative economists would balk at even calling them tax cuts since they don't cut marginal tax rates, even temporarily. Tax credits aren't really tax cuts to supply-side economists.  But even that is too much for Sen. Tom Harkin who tosses this moldy piece of cliched criticism at #44 in the NY Times:

There is only one thing we have got to do in the stimulus, and that is how can we create jobs,” said Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, as he left the meeting. “I am a little concerned by the way that Mr. Summers and others are going at this in that, to me, it still looks like a little more of this trickle-down, if we just put it in at the top, it’s going to trickle down. A number of people in there said, ‘Look, we have got to have programs that actually create jobs and put people to work.

"Trickle-down economics", you know, is the concept that businesses and entrepreneurs  and investors actually create jobs -- not government redistributionists. Weird.  Imagine if Obama actually cut corporate and capital gains taxes? But, hey, Obama said the same thing about John McCain. Here is a snippet from last October:

"The decline in our GDP didn’t happen by accident – it is a direct result of the Bush administration’s trickle down, Wall Street first, Main Street last policies that John McCain has embraced for the last eight years and plans to continue for the next four. These policies didn’t work then, they won’t work now, and I’m running for President to end them."

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

In a perfect world with ethical businessmen and pro-American executives we would be able to trust corporations and give huge tax cuts. We should be able to give big tax breaks but should also have an expectation to see that money pay us back. But...unless you've been in a coma...huge corps have made their huge wealth in America on American backs with American money from American consumers but rather than pay back America with tax cuts such as the Bush tax cuts, they took that money and bought foreign labor, foreign real estate and hid profits into foriegn tax shelters essentially shafting the America that made them who they are. Americans aren't the consumers. American incomes are the consumers. Dropping, stagnant or eliminated incomes kill consumers in turn killing the very corps that think it's wise to invest and spend in foriegn lands. High corp taxes are simply a way to force the money to stay in America rather than let the execs ship it across borders. Nobody, democrat or republican, want high taxes for anybody but only the democrats seem to be thinking realistically and long term big picture and the republicans seem to want to continue to "trust" execs to do the right thing. Your philosophy is exactly what we want but we have nobody ethical and trustworthy enough to do it. There is simply too much demand on corp execs to turn exorbinate profits from stockholders so execs will burn their own family to deliver to hold that million dollar per year job.

Greg of CO 5:58PM January 11, 2009

Pethokoukis seems fundamentally incapable of understanding that tax policies have different effects when the economy is contracting as opposed to expanding. Cutting the capital gains tax would be effective? Did you not notice the epic financial panic last year? Remember, it's a capital GAINS tax.

And FYI, "conservative economists" aren't the same thing as "supply-side economists." Greg Mankiw is a conservative economist, and he famously called supply-side economists "cranks and charlatans." There's a reason no one respects supply-siders.

Learn a lot of economics in Journalism School, did you?

This blog should be called Happy Meal Economics, because Pethokoukis has all the economic sophistication of a college freshman in Econ 101.

Nick of NY 7:37PM January 09, 2009

Pethokoukis seems fundamentally incapable of understanding that tax policies have different effects when the economy is contracting as opposed to expanding. Cutting the capital gains tax would be effective? Did you not notice the epic financial panic last year? Remember, it's a capital GAINS tax.

And FYI, "conservative economists" aren't the same thing as "supply-side economists." Greg Mankiw is a conservative economist, and he famously called supply-side economists "cranks and charlatans." There's a reason no one respects supply-siders.

Learn a lot of economics in Journalism School, did you?

This blog should be called Happy Meal Economics, because Pethokoukis has all the economic sophistication of a college freshman in Econ 101.

Nick of NY 7:37PM January 09, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement