Liberals: We Need $2 Trillion in Stimulus Spending

January 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Economic analyst Robert Kuttner voices the liberal dream of using the recession to justify spending  trillions of dollars on loads of liberal policy wishes, all to the tune of $2 trillion over the next two years (all to be paid for with sharply higher taxes down the line, I am sure). Here are some excerpts (bold is mine):

1) Aid to state and local governments [so they can avoid layoffs or cuts in services]. Cost: $200 billion.

2) Emergency revenue sharing to states and cities by picking up half of the state share of Medicaid. Cost: $100 billion.

3) Have government temporarily pay most of the cost of COBRA coverage for laid off people who lose their health insurance, and allow people over age 55 to buy into Medicare. Cost: $100 billion.

4) Expand Unemployment Insurance to cover part time workers, extend eligibility period, and increase benefit levels. Cost: $50 billion.

5) Roll back tuitions at state universities and community colleges, and increase Pell Grants--contingent on universities not increasing costs to students. Cost: $100 billion.

6) Declare a temporary holiday on the worker share of the Social Security tax, and have government make up the loss to the trust fund, contingent on employers not cutting wages. Cost: $450 billion.


7) Continue many of the [previously mentioned] relief programs into a second year, as economic conditions warrant. Cost: $500 billion.


8) Use direct federal lending to refinance distressed mortgages, and as necessary reduce the outstanding principal amount. This can begin by mid-2009. Cost: $200 billion of subsidy; most additional debt is eventually repaid.

9) Begin planning immediately for a broad range of infrastructure programs, from traditional outlay on roads, bridges and mass transit to spending on 21st century infrastructure such as retrofitting homes, green energy, universal broadband, and smart-grid electricity systems. Spend money on worker training as necessary. Cost: $300 billion.

Total stimulus is two trillion dollars over two years, or about seven percent of GDP a year. If we spend at this level, we can avoid the worst, and a recovery can begin by 2010. Along the way, we will make life better for a lot of working and middle class people, create (or prevent the destruction of) millions of decently-paying jobs, and rebuild public systems that have gone to ruin. A secondary benefit is that people start believing in government again.

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

NO, people should not stop spending. Public spending is the only thing that will keep the economy afloat. Not goverment spending. We need people to be confident in the market and the dollar of America, so they can spend and the businesses reap and create more jobs, which creates more product that the public buy, sell, etc. and the cycle repeats. You go on a "spending diet" and you got businesses clamoring to put better and cheaper products on the shelves so they can make money and stay afloat and no one buys them. It makes no sense. You really need to look into your facts before you write them.

Kenny C of HI 3:55PM April 14, 2009

Was that really not Satire? Seven percent of the GDP dilluted by more American printed dollars that aren't backed up by anything beyond a promise and our credit rating isn't going to do any of us any good. Let me put it to you like this, read it slow so you understand, because this is a really simple way to understand the problem. If you have a potato chip (United States Economy) and it is worth 10 calories (GDP), and you bust it up into 20 small pieces (American Dollar value), how many potato chips do you have? Do you have 20 smaller potato ships still worth 10 calories each? Or do you just have a pile of crumbs that aren't worth very much? Hint to all of those reading, there is only one way out of this mess, it's like the Biggest Loser, we as a society need to go on a spending diet, stop buying everything off the shelf at your local retailer. Reduce the need for the government to come in and spend our money, we as citizens now how to redistribute our money better than they do. Allow the Government to do things like act as a National Defense agency and force them to make cut backs on their own spending, abolish the "Use or lose" policy that just makes things worse. Force those companies that are receiving our American Tax dollars to use on-shore suppliers for their goods. I can go on but I don't want to hurt too many peoples brains on here

Chuck of MN 11:29AM February 18, 2009

It just doesn't matter anymore the cash is worthless!just make it 50 trillion whats the difference anyway? How will they SURVIVE the REVOLUTION is the real question??????

joe james of NJ 11:44PM January 14, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement