Will Capitalism Turn China Into a Democracy?

January 17, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Democracy first, market economy later. At least that is the conclusion of this paper, Democracy, Market Liberalization and Political Preferences.

The main result of this paper is that in transition countries democracy increases popular support for the market, while economic liberalization does not influence support for democracy. Our data do not support the widespread view that democracy needs naturally emerge as a by-product of capitalism. Instead, our results indicate that building democratic institutions can act as an ingredient in favor of market liberalization, whereas early market development is no guarantee of subsequent popular support for democracy, particularly in less developed countries of our sample in Central Asia and the former Soviet Union. These observations are consistent with the empirical fact that market economies can live without democracy, whereas there is no historical evidence of a democratic society without a market economy (Dahl, 1982b). One explanation for this is certainly that preferences of citizens do not, by definition, matter in autocracies.28 Our results illustrate an alternative explanation, which is that the determinants of the support for democracy have to be found elsewhere: market liberalization, in itself, is not sufficient to trigger the demand for democracy. One tentative explanation for the positive relationship between democracy and support for a market economy, which is explored in more details in a related paper (Grosjean and Senik, 2008), can be found in the impact of democracy on income distribution. We find support for the hypothesis that although rising income inequality in itself triggers backlash against reforms, extending democratic rights appears as a credible promise of future income redistribution (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2000, 2002, Acemoglu et al., 2007b) and acts as a positive ingredient in reinforcing adhesion to the economic reform process.

Me: I am fairly certain is that the failure of capitalism will surely make China less democratic. The current economic slowdown is causing increasing social unrest and more opression in response.

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I AM SURE THAT WE NEED TO DEFINE LIBERALIZATION ONCE AGAIN IN ORDER TO ACHEIVE GREATER RULE FOR MARKET ECONOY. THIS COULD CHANGE THE RULE OF CHINA IN THIS TRANSION PERIOD .

GHOAM HASSAN ABIRI 10:21AM January 22, 2009

This seem more prophetic, given our spending and debt:

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. "

Luther of IL 2:23AM January 19, 2009

Economic prosperity can accomplish some changes, and economic hardships foster the reverse. Still, for the Chinese people to truly embrace democracy, they would have to throw off their ingrained cultural assumptions that the individual is of no importance and is without inherent rights. Given the vast numbers of Chinese, it seems safe to say that they could throw off their oppressive form of government if they chose to do so. In China, the tail wags the dog.

The Chinese have always accepted subjugation in one form or another. It is my hope that if anything at all good comes of "globalization", it will be to finally expose them to their own individual worth and possibilities.

phoenician lady of AZ 10:01PM January 18, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement