Toxic Assets Toxic to Geithner Bank Bailout Plan: Updated

February 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Update: (12:25  PM): Geithner calls this a "recession" not a "depression." {Pay attention to this, Brits.) Says things are still deteriorating but will by improving a year from now.

Update: (12:21 PM): Geither says he is for a strong dollar. Of course.

Update: 12:18 PM): Geithner gives the "I screwed up" answer on his tax troubles. Now Leisman asks about valuing the toxic assets.  Geithner talks about there being "lots of different ideas out there." Leisman asks him to give an example of how this public privagte partnership would work. Geithner instead gives the broad outlines again. And then he talks about the rest of the program.

Update: (12:12 PM): Great, they are bringing in Steve Leisman after the break.

Update ( 12: 07 PM ): Brian Williams is the wrong guy to do this interview. He is not pinning him down on the toxic assets plan.

Update ( 12:03 PM ):  Brian Williams is interviewing Geithner right now on CNBC. Right now all Geithner is giving him is talking points and telling him what "challenging and complicated problem it is."  Yeah, we got that part.

Update (11:59 AM): This is the killer quote from Geithner's speech: "We are exploring a range of different structures for this program, and will seek input from market participants and the public as we design it." In other words, we have plan to have a plan. Ouch.

After listening to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner reveal the Obama bank bailout plan, I still have no idea what the government is going to do about pricing these so-called toxic assets. And that, my friends, is why I would guess the stock market is selling off.

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

lKmIuo

Qxoizxhr of IL 9:17PM July 15, 2009

Here's an idea: Form a new holding company, call it "Hope America," (thank you Karen from Fast Money, CNBC) and issue shares to every retail investor who wants in at $10 per share, min investment 100 shares. Meanwhile, force banks to transfer toxic assets to new company at 75% of book value (they should pay something for their stupidity). Sell the shares in Hope America like war bonds from FDR's day. I'd buy some myself. Any upside can be issued to shareholders in the form of dividends, risk goes into the everyday trading of the shares. Why not? Makes a lot of sense to this former equity analyst from Wall Street.

MHalyard of FL 7:50PM February 12, 2009

Sure he's pushy and obnoxious but he is not intelligent enough to handle a toxic asset discussion.

Pat of IL 2:27PM February 10, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement