Saving the Banking System in Four Easy Steps

February 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

Those bank CEOs may have been, as my friend Larry Kudlow put it,  "dead men walking into a Soviet show trial," but something of use came out of it -- an idea on how to fix the banking system from Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit. He wants bank mark-to-market losses to be realized over time rather than immediately.  Vinny Catalano tell us how that process might work:

1) Bank surrenders certain “toxic assets” to the PPIB

2) Bank declares such assets as a “loss” but does not record the entire loss to its income statement

3) Bank writes down a portion of the “loss” immediately and schedules to do same over the life of the asset

4) Bank retains the ability to revalue such assets over time via a note from PPIB In dollars and cents,

Here's how this works:

1) “Toxic assets” held on the books for $0.80 on the dollar are surrendered to PPIB at $0.30 on the dollar

2) PPIB (Treasury and investors) own the assets at $0.30 Bank lists a $0.50 off-balance sheet “loss” that is amortized at 10% per year, or $0.05 to the income statement (and then to the balance sheet)

3) Over time, markets become more normalized, the economy recovers and the “toxic assets” rise in value to $0.60, where they come due and cease to exist

4) Bank, which has written down the loss over several years, say $0.30 cents in total, now realizes a $0.10 gain ($0.60 cents final value, $0.50 amortized value still on the books, $0.10 gain)

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I think the term "Toxic" negates the term assets unless liquidated ergo simply auction them off and reregulate to stop the bleeding. We cannot hold everyoe's hands forever, there mut be losers in this world else everyone loses!!!

Ray Fisher of NM 12:05PM February 17, 2009

Wow, Tony Lee has quite eloquently described a macro laymen's version of American Capitalism and financial markets in a nutshell.

However, it was a very shallow analysis of why Vikram Pandit's solution won't work, nor did he offer any solutions. Forecasting "it is bad" and "who knows how much worse" are a couple of years late, and offer no insight towards a solution.

I think Pandit's idea has merit. I also offer that perhaps we consider wether we should continue to allow unregulated gambling via the derivatives market. Banks and underwriters are financial institutions, not bookies.

See: http://seekingalpha.com/article/117312-derivatives-and-bank-collapse-the-scam-that-went-largely-unreported

Nate Emery (Faisal's Dad) of VA 4:00PM February 15, 2009

Let's see.....The national debt of the US and all of their unfunded liabilities is around 65 trillion dollars using Generally Accepted Accounting Practices. Thats more than the world's GDP! I thought I read the title of the article to be saving the banking system in four easy steps? Is the writer stupid? Four easy steps?

I've got some land I want to sell you. I swear that if these Obama kool-aid drinkers had an IQ that was one point lower, they would be rocks! If they were a bag of hammers they would at least be useful, but a rock?

jeff of WI 7:13AM February 15, 2009

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement