What Obama's Cap-And-Trade Plan Will Cost You

March 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print

A study from the George C. Marshall Institute tries to quantify the costs of a cap-and-trade plan to reduce carbon emissions. They're not small, to say the least: And although this study uses 2008 as a baseline, the Obama plan would hit in 2012 and could come in combo with a hike in investment and incomes taxes for wealthier Americans and the creation of a special healthcare tax:

The authors find that the constraints posed by the Lieberman-Warner cap-and-trade approach is equivalent to a constant (in percentage terms) consumption decrease of about 1% each year, continuing to 2050. Put another way, the cap-and-trade approach is the equivalent of a permanent tax increase for the average American household, which was estimated to be $1,100 in 2008, would rise to $1,437 by 2015, to $1,979 in 2030, and $2,979 in 2050.

Reviewing a host of recent studies, Buckley and Mityakov show that estimates of job losses attributable to cap-and-trade range in the hundreds of thousands. The price for energy paid by the American consumer also will rise. The studies reviewed showed electricity prices jumping 5-15% by 2015, natural gas prices up 12-50% by 2015, and gasoline prices up 9-145% by 2015. As an illustration, gasoline would suffer a 16 cent price increase per gallon at the low end of the estimates to a $2.58 penalty at the high end (using the January 2009 reported retail price of $1.78 per gallon).

Reader Comments Read all comments (119)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It would not matter who the President is. This does not come from Obama, it came from the puppet masters themselves. His hands are tied, and he also knew what he was walking into. If McCain were president, the same thing would be happening. I guarantee it, just a different brand of rhetoric.

The source of this bull sh*! is the World Bank. Do your research and you will figure it out.

Billy Bob of OR 12:43PM April 21, 2010

YES, IMPEACH OBAMA, NANCY, and REID!!!!

Sean Hannity was correct about this character. He is a dictator. It's so sad that we have men and women that don't have enough character and intestional fortitude to stand up to Pelosi. All it took for the 'nut' from Oklahoma to change his vote was an Obama grin and a ride on Air Force One and the so call meeting with the Obama staged event with his hand picked people shouting "sign the bill". How dumb can you be? Obama is a liar,he has more synonyms for the word lie. He is dishonest and cannot be trusted. These congressmen and senators are suspose to represent us. The citizens have expressed themselves-yet they do not represent us. We have a welfare government-what ever happened to honest work? I am a retired teacher of 48 years. The worst thing that ever happened to our school system was government intervention. Just imagine what all the government will run after these dishonest and sneaky people get out of office. There is no excuse today why people can't get an education, get a job, and provide for themselves. I am tired of hearing the 'poor people'---Obama talks like everyone should go to college. Not everyone needs to go to college and it does not mean that they are not smart. Some of the smartest people that I know and taught are the dumbest people I know. The media talks

about how smart Obama is, well there are people in prison that are just that smart (dishonest, theives, sneaky).

AND people thought Nixon was a crook! What he did is minor compared to these Chicago politics! There has been nothing but dirty,dirty politics since this guy became president in a dishonest election.In reference to being the 'poor people'. I can write about how poor my family was when I was growing up when my father made $40.00 a week with six children, one with celebral palsy. We would have qualified for free lunches but my dad would have 'died' if he thought we would take free anything. My mother packed 5 brown bags with peanut butter and banana sandwiches every morning. My dad said "I brought these children into the world and I will take care of them". When we went on a class field trip, we saved our money all year to pay for it, not free. WE were taught that we would go to college somehow and five of us did,we borrowed money, paid it back, worked, and earned a scholarship,the gov. didn't owe me an education. I chose to teach for to provide for my family, educate my sons the same way I got my education. I chose to save and spend wisely for my future. It is a choice that each has to make. Our government is an enabler to these people who get everything free and expect everything free. If they got an education, and had to provide for themselves there would be less crime because they would have to work to pay for that baby food, that doctor bill, that mortgage, and wouldn't have time to get in trouble. Some of the happiest people work hard, provide for their families, and are 'poor'. CHARACTER!!

Mary of GA 7:20PM March 21, 2010

Ducktron,

If you want to get your point across, you might try correct spelling, capitalization and punctuation. Otherwise, people might get the idea that you are an idiot and no matter how valid a point might be, it is ultimately dismissed because you clearly indentify yourself as a dolt. You are exactly the type of person that I DON'T want representing me and my beliefs. Nice job.

A of CT 10:02AM February 24, 2010

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement