Pelosi: Second Stimulus Possible

March 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print

 A couple of hours ago I wrote about the possibility of a second stimulus package. Then this from Politico:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday she is open to introducing a second stimulus bill, but it's too early to determine the size of such a package and the timing on another major economic measure. “We have to keep the door open to see how it goes,” Pelosi told reporters Tuesday following a House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee hearing on the economy.

Again, let me repeat of a few ideas from a month ago: 1) eliminate capital-gains taxes so that the income tax would be transformed into a de facto consumption tax that encourages investment; 2) dramatically cut or eliminate business taxes so that U.S. companies could better compete globally; 3) index Social Security benefits to inflation and extend the retirement age, allowing a big cut in payroll taxes for the middle class; 4) create government-funded "innovation prizes" for key technology challenges; and 5) give universities financial incentives to create more science geeks and offer grad students free-floating fellowships to choose the field with the best prospects.

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

They bail out everyone except the middle class who is now paying more for everything. We, the middle class need a third extension on unemployment. The companies are laying off and pulling back so finding a job is like finding that needle in the hey stack, are we not as deserving as AIG???

JoAnn Smith of CA 9:31PM April 08, 2009

What we need is real economic stimulus that provides structural benefit for long term growth. Corporate tax relief would be the silver bullet that sparks the economy. If corporate taxes were eliminated permanently, the present value of every stock will be higher by 54%. Translate this into the stock market and prices would skyrocket overnight. The wealth effect created would jolt the economy, companies, including banks, would be able to raise capital at much higher prices, businesses would feel more confident about investing for growth, employment would improve and take housing with it. The effect on the stock market could be even greater as investors anticipate a stronger economy, thus creating a vicious circle of improving confidence. According to Congressional Budget Office estimates, corporate income tax will contribute $223 billion of tax revenue in 2009 compared to total revenues of $2.5 billion, less than 10% of our tax base comes from corporations. The cost over the next 11 years would amount to $3.5 trillion in forgone tax revenue. That pales in comparison next the amounts which may be spent on alternative methods in a potentially prolonged recession, not including the forgone income tax revenue and unemployment benefits that will need to be paid. Eliminating corporate income tax would spur long term growth, leading to higher individual taxes in the future, and it would incentivize multi-nationals to repatriate capital back into the country. Corporations serve a vital function in society. They are important conduits in allocating resources and creating jobs. I hope that the corporation bashing that is taking place in Washington can be replaced by cooperation, and sensible solutions that can be sustained for the long term health of our country.

Brian Matuszak, CFA of MI 10:11PM March 11, 2009

Lets look at your suggestions and actually think about the implications for a second:

1) Do you seriously think that the reason people aren't investing right now is because of the Capital Gains tax? That they're worried about punitive taxes on returns? This is a republican go-to and suggests you haven't understood or thought about the problems we're facing at all. Its a worthless suggestion made with an infantile understanding of the issue.

2) Not a bad idea, but decidedly incomplete. You can do this, but you need to either decide what programs to cut (or run up an even higher deficit) or close the loopholes in the current tax system and go after tax havens.

3) It's funny how many people complain about those losing their retirement savings (as they rightly should) but will, without the blink of an eye, propose extending the retirement age. This effectively STEALS part of these people's retirement. Not "I don't have as much money for retirement" but "I have less retirement all together".

4) So inventing a better car battery wouldn't be have enough rewards in patents and sales? You actually think the extra $300 million suggested by McCain during the campaign would mean anything on top of the piles of money they'd already be getting from inventing it?

5) This is actually a good idea and I have nothing snarky to say about it.

Robert Grifin of PA 2:56PM March 11, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement