Bernanke: Blame China, Not Greenspan

April 14, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

While not letting U.S. mortgage markets off the hook for the credit crisis, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben today Bernanke highlighted the role of excess savings from emerging Asia flowing:

In the past 10 to 15 years, the United States and some other industrial countries have been the recipients of a great deal of foreign saving. Much of this foreign saving came from fast-growing emerging market countries in Asia and other places where consumption has lagged behind rising incomes, as well as from oil-exporting nations that could not profitably invest all their revenue at home and thus looked abroad for investment opportunities. ... Saving inflows from abroad can be beneficial if the country that receives those inflows invests them well. Unfortunately, that was not always the case in the United States and some other countries. Financial institutions reacted to the surplus of available funds by competing aggressively for borrowers, and, in the years leading up to the crisis, credit to both households and businesses became relatively cheap and easy to obtain. One important consequence was a housing boom in the United States, a boom that was fueled in large part by a rapid expansion of mortgage lending. Unfortunately, much of this lending was poorly done, involving, for example, little or no down payment by the borrower or insufficient consideration by the lender of the borrower's ability to make the monthly payments.

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

In 1992 the Clinton administration revised congress’ banks, called the Government Sponsored Enterprises. They were to sponsor ever increasing percentage of loans to the “poor.” Congress and their allies in HUD set that percentage at 52% loans to the poor in 2008 when they went bankrupt. The loans that they gave out became a pork barrel for the local politicians. They appointed liberal politicos to lead Fannie and Freddie, and spent $200 Million on lobbyists in 10 years to keep congress from regulating this monstrosity. If the corporate officers at Fannie and Freddie didn’t give that percent of loans to the “poor” then the house subcommittee on would call them on the carpet. The leadership of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with the help of Mass. Rep. Barney Frank, developed loan packages that were guaranteed to cause default. During the 2003 hearings on corruption and accounting manipulation in Fannie Mae, Fannie’s CEO Franklin Raines was commended by Maxine Waters for producing the “no interest loan” in consultation with the Representatives Housing Subcommittee.

In August 2008, Barney Frank asked “why didn’t the Republicans stop this if it’s real. They were in charge.” The answer is simple: Conneticut Senator Chris Dodd threatened a filibuster to prevent anyone from adequately regulating the GSEs. Most of the sixteen Republican senators who called for regulation of the GSE’s in 2006 were targeted by the Democrats and defeated. Before 2006 Republicans in congress couldn’t do anything about this because so many congressmen had been corrupted.

To get an eyeful of the GSEs Tammany Hall activities, such as paying lobbyists to intimidate congressional oversight as they did in Chris Shays case, or hiring family members to get representatives or senators to sabotage efforts to regulate Fannie and Freddie as they did in the case of Utah Repuclican Senator Robbins. For more specifics, see Beverly McLean's article online on Fortune/CNN on 25 January 2005 [http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/01/24/8234040/index.htm]. The August 2002 Washingtonian also detailed the Government Sponsored Enterprises's corruption [http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/8593.html] as did the Wall Street Journal for the past eight years.)

Warnings by the responsible financial leaders were ignored and the whistleblowers were castigated in the press. Chairman Greenspan solemnly warned the Senate Banking Committee on: “April 6, 2005 Greenspan further stated at a Senate Banking Committee hearing: “If we fail to institute GSE regulations we increase the possibility of insolvency and crisis.” Greenspan was dismayed that 23% of all home mortgages were guaranteed by the GSEs. http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/2005/20050406/default.htm

William Poole President of the St. Louis Federal reserve reported that as of October 2006, The 14 GSE’s were bankrupt in 2006, but no-one could get them regulated b

Doug Miles of AL 4:23PM May 13, 2009

Lessons learned from The Great Depression were gutted by the 106th. Congress. Google S-900 Roll Call for the bi-partisan, pro Wall Street outcome.

This isn't about China. Its about corporate power and greed. Its also about the role campaign money plays to hi-jack American Democracy.

And finally, Its about how the corporate controlled media fails to provide objective news. For real non-partisan examples and commentary from veteran journalist, check out:

http://www.freedomfromthepress.net

Steven Thompson of WA 1:34AM April 24, 2009

Like the dollar or not...like Greenspan or Bernanke or not, the U.S. dollar will be the international currency for a long time. Some say you need a currency with a firm underpinning, like the gold standard, find me one. Mis-valued currencies are a problem and screw up world trade. The Yuan has been mis-valued fro a very long time but the Chinese government has been allowed to get away with it and will continue to abuse the concept. So much for the value of the world bank and for their entry into WTO. I was in China when they entered WTO and what a sham in their requirement to qualify.

Let's try the requirement that they comply with Trade Secret and International Patent Laws. China's reply: we have six months before we have to comply, every research center in China will spend the next six months copying every patent possible. Then in six months we will comply to those that we did not already know about. Vials of water and dust were placed on shelves to show that China already knew about them.

The Shanghai Organic Chemical Research Institute was central to this process. They graduate 50+ PHds a year. They did the reasearch. One of the heads of the Institute also openly stated that one of their goals was to place grad students in R&D firms in the U.S. and Europe for three to four years and then have them come back to China to tell what they had "learned".

I was there, who else was? Tell your stories.

Don of MA 6:18AM April 15, 2009

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement